On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> > The above is the BSD license, the classic open-source license. While the
> > GPL has similar goals, PostgreSQL developers find the restrictions
> > imposed by the GPL to be unacceptable. Since the BSD license has no
> > such restrictions, we like it and have no intention of changing it.
>
> If you feel you must bother to mention this whole sordid topic somewhere
> in the documentation, I much prefer the already-suggested,
> non-judgemental wording (by Mitch Vincent and others) of something like:
>
> Postgres has been developed and released under the BSD license
> from its inception. Code contributed to the main distribution
> is assumed to be, and must be, released under this same license.
>
> Frankly, I'm not sure why I should be uncomfortable with GPL, and I'm
> not sure that a FAQ should presume to explain why I am, especially if I
> am not. But I *am* comfortable with the ground rules of PostgreSQL which
> have been there since the beginning and with which we have seen
> tremendous growth and maturity of the project and product. Good enough
> for me ;)
Tom, the word "uncomfortable" was removed. Maybe you should reread it.
Vince.
--
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev@michvhf.com http://www.pop4.net
56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking
Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com
Online Giftshop Superstore http://www.cloudninegifts.com
==========================================================================
