Lincoln Yeoh wrote:
> At 11:26 AM 1/25/02 +0100, Holger Krug wrote:
> >so I won't repeat that stuff here), but I know that for scenarios like
> >yours connection pooling was invented. Connection pooling avoids the
> >creation of a new backend process for each single query. Did you ever
> >try your test with connection pooling ? Real databases *require*
> >connection pooling in such a case, MySQL or file systems
>
> If the database crashes are not due to resource limits, connection pooling
> does not seem to be the real solution.
The crash he reported this time looks like a backend dumping core. I wonder how he killed the postmaster the
last time and if he by doing it with -9 corrupted the database?
The entire discussion is somehow pointless. Tell some Riksha- puller to compare his Riksha with this brand new
Ferrari,and wait his comments after the test drive. He'll probably won't get the damn thing moving, and if, it'd
bea hell of a ride, so he will tell you that his Riksha has a much better handling and the Ferrari
*crashed*.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
