Bruce Momjian wrote:
> The above is the BSD license, the classic open-source license. It has no
> restrictions on how the source code may be used. We like it and have no
> intention of changing it.
Much better. I personally think that mentioning the historical
connection (i.e. code developed at Berkeley, released under BSD) would
help quelch the "why not change?" questions. At least I think it makes
a simple answer to such questions. If someone doesn't think that it is important to respect the license under which
theearly developers
released their code, that's a clue that they're not clueful enough to
bother talking to, isn't it?
--
Don Baccus
Portland, OR
http://donb.photo.net, http://birdnotes.net, http://openacs.org
