Re: pg_upgrade - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: pg_upgrade
Date
Msg-id 200201110542.g0B5gjm18397@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade  (Daniel Kalchev <daniel@digsys.bg>)
List pgsql-hackers
Daniel Kalchev wrote:
> >>>Bruce Momjian said:
>  > I will not enable it until everyone agrees.  Are there people interested
>  > in this tool being in 7.2, or who are against this tool being in 7.2?
> 
> I have never trusted pg_upgrade on production databases. This is where it is 
> actually targeted to (to minimize downtime). I have always done full 
> pg_dumpall and then full recreation of the database system, which 
> unfortunately in my cases take few hours. With so many little changes in the 
> structures pg_upgrade it is probably not very safe method anyway?
> 
> Just my opinion. :-)

I agree.  There are just too many people who complain to me about a lack
of pg_upgrade that I have to do my best on it and let people decide if
they want to use it.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Daniel Kalchev
Date:
Subject: Re: again on index usage
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade