Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem
Date
Msg-id 200201050032.g050Wbm18345@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> This still leaves me undecided whether to apply the first or second
> version of the LWLock patch.

I vote for the second.  Logically it makes more sense, and my guess is
that the first patch wins only if there are enough CPU's available to
run all the newly-awoken processes.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Matthew Kirkwood
Date:
Subject: Re: O_DIRECT use
Next
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem