Re: bug in join? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Laurette Cisneros
Subject Re: bug in join?
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.33.0201021414390.17257-100000@visor.corp.nextbus.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: bug in join?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: bug in join?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Yeah, the culprit appears to be vacuum analyze (vacuum alone doesn't do it).

The problem is that I fixed the original database by dropping and
recreating the tables populating them with backed up data.  And, now it
won't recreate (the values in pg_stats for them is lost).

Ugh.

I will keep trying to recreate it for you.

L.
On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Tom Lane wrote:

> Laurette Cisneros <laurette@nextbus.com> writes:
> > This join worked last week and today it gets and error:
> > select * from b, d
> >  where b.address = d.address;
> > It now fails with the following error:
> > ERROR:  join_selectivity: bad value -0.121693
>
> Probably what has changed is the pg_statistic data (VACUUM ANALYZE
> results).  Please send the results of
>
> select * from pg_stats where tablename = 'b';
> select * from pg_stats where tablename = 'd';
>
>             regards, tom lane
>

-- 
Laurette Cisneros
(510) 420-3137
NextBus Information Systems, Inc.
www.nextbus.com
Passenger Information Everywhere



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Bulkloading using COPY - ignore duplicates?
Next
From: Laurette Cisneros
Date:
Subject: Re: bug in join?