Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dominic J. Eidson
Subject Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.33.0201210946450.23955-100000@morannon.the-infinite.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I'd get rid of the 'foreseeable future' part myself ...
> > >
> > > The whole thing is too wordy.
> > >
> > > Many PostgreSQL developers past and present are uncomfortable with
> > > restrictions imposed by the GPL.  The PostgreSQL project always has
> > > and will continue to remain under the BSD license alone.
> >
> > This one is perfect ... Bruce?  I really leaves no openings, no?
>
> It is hard to argue with this wording either.  Let's see how people
> vote.

As one of those who contributed my $.02 to PostgreSQL, I think short is
sweet.

'tis got my vote.

--
Dominic J. Eidson
                                        "Baruk Khazad! Khazad ai-menu!" - Gimli
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.the-infinite.org/              http://www.the-infinite.org/~dominic/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: RTLD_LAZY considered harmful (Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems)