On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> > The above is the BSD license, the classic open-source license. While the
> > GPL has similar goals, PostgreSQL developers find the restrictions
> > imposed by the GPL to be unacceptable. Since the BSD license has no
> > such restrictions, we like it and have no intention of changing it.
>
> *I* don't find GPL unacceptable. Some of my favorite software (present
> company excepted of course) has it. But I am and have always been
> satisfied that the BSD license (predating GPL as Don points out) serves
> Postgres and PostgreSQL just fine.
And now you know why I wanted the word "many" in there.
Vince.
--
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev@michvhf.com http://www.pop4.net
56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking
Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com
Online Giftshop Superstore http://www.cloudninegifts.com
==========================================================================
