Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.30.0201211608480.687-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL
Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian writes:

> > > Many PostgreSQL developers past and present are uncomfortable with
> > > restrictions imposed by the GPL.  The PostgreSQL project always has
> > > and will continue to remain under the BSD license alone.
> >
> > This one is perfect ... Bruce?  I really leaves no openings, no?
>
> It is hard to argue with this wording either.  Let's see how people
> vote.

Besides the poor grammar in the second sentence, it's also incorrect,
because the whole point of the BSD license to some people is that it is
not "alone" under the BSD license but can be relicensed in other ways.

I think we should just scrap it and get on with our lives.  There are
about 2 questions a year about the license issues, which does not qualify
it as "FAQ" anyway.

--
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Mitch Vincent"
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL
Next
From: Vince Vielhaber
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL