Re: 7.1 vs. 7.2 on AIX 5L - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: 7.1 vs. 7.2 on AIX 5L
Date
Msg-id 200201102008.g0AK8Rd11467@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 7.1 vs. 7.2 on AIX 5L  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp> writes:
> > I have made a new version of pgbench which allows not to update
> > branches and tellers tables, which should significantly reduce the
> > contentions.
> 
> I used this version of pgbench in some fresh runs on RedHat's 4-way SMP
> Linux box.  I did several test runs under varying conditions (pgbench
> scale 500 or 50, checkpoint_segments/wal_files either default 3/0 or
> 30/5, fsync on or off).  I compared current CVS tip (including the
> now-committed lwlock rev 2 patch) to 7.1.3.  The results are attached.
> As you can see, current beats 7.1 pretty much across the board on that
> hardware.  The reason seems to be revealed by looking at vmstat output.
> Typical "vmstat 5" output for 7.1.3 (here in a 6-client pgbench -N
> run) is

Those are dramatic graphs.  Is it the WAL increase that made 7.2 much
faster?

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: again on index usage
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Sequence rows need to have FrozenTransactionId