Re: [ADMIN] postgresql under Windows is slow - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Matthew T. O'Connor
Subject Re: [ADMIN] postgresql under Windows is slow
Date
Msg-id 200201301832.g0UIWeS05299@neuromancer.ctlno.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [ADMIN] postgresql under Windows is slow  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 30 January 2002 11:58 am, Tom Lane wrote:
> Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su> writes:
> > anybody has an experience how is stable postgresql under Windows system ?
> > I tried postgresq 7.1 under Cygwin, Windows 98 and was dissapointed
> > by very bad performance. Are there something I could tune ?
> > I got 250 sel/sec on simple select from table with 500 rows !
> > Under Linux I have 2500 sel/sec.
>
> Never tried it myself, but I distinctly recall someone reporting that
> they got comparable performance on Cygwin as on Linux.  You might try
> asking on pgsql-cygwin.

We have a few developers that run Apache, PHP, Postgresql on Win2k and we 
have definitely seen postgres be a good bit slower on Windows.  Have never 
benchmarked it however.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8WD6K8BXvT14W9HARAh+GAJwKqs2k8fwJYooenFCqHMMgXr0DjQCcCaQr
bQxY10HunpD2+IACH/L0yas=
=p8Mb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] postgresql under Windows is slow
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Syscaches should store negative entries, too