Home > mailing lists

Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From	Jeffrey W. Baker
Subject	Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem
Date	January 3, 2002 11:46:54
Msg-id	Pine.LNX.4.33.0112291800180.31300-100000@windmill.gghcwest.com Whole thread Raw
In response to	Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List	pgsql-hackers

Tree view

On Sat, 29 Dec 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> OK, here are the results on BSD/OS 4.2 on a 2-cpu system.  The first is
> before the patch, the second after.  Both average 14tps, so the patch
> has no negative effect on my system.  Of course, it has no positive
> effect either.  :-)

Actually it looks slighty worse with the patch.  What about CPU usage?

-jwb

pgsql-hackers by date:

From: Bruce Momjian
Date: 03 January 2002, 11:46:37
Subject: Re: Are we accepting cancel interrupts too often?

From: Tom Lane
Date: 03 January 2002, 11:46:55
Subject: Re: Are we accepting cancel interrupts too often?

Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

Previous

Next