Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.30.0201201709400.712-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems  (teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød))
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane writes:

> I'm still quite nervous about making these changes so late in the cycle.
> OTOH I suspect Andreas was right: we haven't been getting any pltcl
> portability testing from our beta testers.

This logic can also be reversed:  We haven't been getting any beta testing
from users of Red Hat 7.1.

> If it's broken now, we can hardly make it worse.

You can surely make things a lot worse for those that are using other
operating systems.  I certainly don't agree with making changes just
because Red Hat blew it.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: mlw
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL
Next
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL