Re: Is there any performance penalty using --with-ssl? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Palle Girgensohn
Subject Re: Is there any performance penalty using --with-ssl?
Date
Msg-id 5920000.1010150060@palle.girgensohn.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Is there any performance penalty using --with-ssl?  ("Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
List pgsql-hackers
--On Friday, January 04, 2002 12:32:26 +0800 Christopher Kings-Lynne 
<chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> wrote:

>> Failure to build/run if SSL libraries are not available?
>>
>> AFAIK there is no run-time penalty, especially not if the server is
>> started without the enable-ssl switch.  But there had better be an
>> SSL library to link with.
>
> Palle - the current Postgres Port uses the 'dialog' command to present a
> menu of what people can optionally compile in.  Why not just leave it in
> that menu?

Reason is, I am invesigating the possibility of totally removing the dialog 
and split all interfaces into separate ports. There are pros and cons to 
this idea, but IMO the pros win.

/Palle





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem
Next
From: Palle Girgensohn
Date:
Subject: Re: Is there any performance penalty using --with-ssl?