Joe Conway wrote:
>
> Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
>
> > Though I've often seen the reference to bytea BLOB
> > I remember no clear negation. Don't we have to negate
> > it clearly from the first ?
> >
> > regards,
> > Hiroshi Inoue
>
> With the changes in 7.2, bytea is actually very close to matching the
> SQL99 definition of binary strings, which it also refers to as BLOB.
> BLOBS should include support for (section 4.3):
>
> <comparison predicate> - yes
> <blob concatenation> - yes
> <blob substring function> - yes
> <blob overlay function> - no
> <trim function> - yes
> <length expression> - yes
> <position expression> - yes
> <like predicate> - yes
> Other than the overlay function,
It seems good as long as they are not large(huge ?).
It seems a significant flaw for bytea to have no
possibility of partial update.
> the primary thing missing is the use of
> hex as the I/O representation.
I don't love the current I/O representation of bytea.
It seems worth adding a new data type only to change the
binary I/O representation.
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
