Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects
Date
Msg-id 29807.1012449060@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects  (Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@netbsd.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes:
> Just a confirmation.
> We can't see any catalog.schema.object notation in 7.3,
> can we ?

No, what I meant was you could write catalog.schema.object --- but for
7.3, the system will only accept it if the catalog name is the same as
the current database.  This satisfies the minimum requirements of the
spec, and it leaves notational room to use the catalog name as the cue
for cross-database access, if we ever decide we want to try to do that.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Hiroshi Inoue
Date:
Subject: Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects