Re: VPATH builds fail - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: VPATH builds fail
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.30.0201081743000.725-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: VPATH builds fail  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane writes:

> There is *no* difference in the #include commands, but apparently the
> #line directives affect gcc's default search path for include files.

I was kind of baffled myself why it worked at all.

> Net result: I'm back to my original statement: VPATH builds will not
> work with a source distribution tarball.  Any objections to the
> -I$(srcdir) trick?

Nope.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Strange results with date/interval arithmetic
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL FILES