Re: RC1 time? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

Just as an FYI, the server is to be upgraded from 512Meg to 4GB over the
next few days ... thanks to everyone that offered to help spring for this,
but Rackspace is only charging us a very small amount to perform the
upgrade itself, with the RAM not costing a thing ...

As for a seperate machine for fts ... I'm in the process of trying to get
a second machine for Hub, since our first machine is just about at
capacity ... it will have 4GB of RAM on her and 7x18Gig RAID5 SCSI ... at
that time, I will move the db.postgresql.org server onto it, so that the
database is on a seperate machine from the web server itself ... I assume
that should help, just a little?

On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Oleg Bartunov wrote:

> On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > btw, if somebody could donate a server dedicated for rapidly growing
> > > > > > mailing list archive (already > 300,000 messages) ? fts.postgresql.org
> > > > > > id currently awfull slow !
> > > > > Or wants to spring for the memory upgrade?  The server is better then we
> > > > > had before, but memory is half of what it was ...
> > > >
> > > > Where is this server located? What would a memory upgrade cost??
> > >
> > > Only Marc knows. I think server is overloaded - it hosts several
> > > rather big projects+database server. More memory will helps but
> > > I'd add several hard drives to separate disk activity.
> >
> >
> > the only thing that server hosts is the PostgreSQL Project ...
>
> Again, I'd prefer to have a separate machine dedicated for fts project.
> I don't like to work in 'jail' bsdish environment :-)
> Currently I see, for example, ftpd process eats about 10hours ! of CPU,
> keep in mind the server rebooted only 2 days ago !
> Disk activity is very high ! There are only 2 disks ..
> simple select from table with 10 records takes about 10 seconds !
> Damn. I think it's time to think seriously about supporting of
> postgresql.org. It's sort of marketing things, but it's very important.
> If, for example, somebody interest in database with full text search
> support and tries fts.postgresql.org, he'll form a very bad opinion
> about search engine, about database. He'll not interested that
> hardware is very limited and this is temporal problem. He will go
> to mysql website :-(
>
> In my opinion, simple PIII server: 1Gb ram, 3 HD  (SCSI) ( system, db, web )
> would be enough for fts.postgresql.org.
>
>
>
>
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
> > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
> >
>
>     Regards,
>         Oleg
> _____________________________________________________________
> Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet,
> Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia)
> Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
> phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83
>
>