Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem
Date
Msg-id 1114.1010101199@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem  (Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Unfortunately, at low scaling factors pgbench is guaranteed to look
>> horrible because of contention for the "branches" rows.  
>> 
> Not really! See graph in my previous post - the database size affects 
> performance much more !

But the way that pgbench is currently set up, you can't really tell the
difference between database size effects and contention effects, because
you can't vary one while holding the other constant.

I based my comments on having done profiles that show most of the CPU
time going into attempts to acquire row locks for updates and/or
checking of dead tuples in _bt_check_unique.  So at least in the
conditions I was using (single CPU) I think those are the bottlenecks.
I don't have any profiles for SMP machines, yet.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: More problem with scripts
Next
From: Brent Verner
Date:
Subject: Re: More problem with scripts