Jan Wieck wrote:
>
<snip>
>
> As said, "simple read-only" is not really something you want
> a full featured RDBMS for. Maybe you are better off with a
> simple and stupid system on the feature level of gdbm or
> MySql.
>
> Jan
I'd agree with this on the query-level functionality... but...
Michael, does Qmail-SQL *store* the email in the database? (haven't
checked)
If so, there's no way I'd want new customer inquiries or other
*important* email stored in a system which didn't know how to fully
recover if the server crashes.
Imagine... 200,000 customer emails in a busy MySQL 3.23.x database, and
the UPS power cuts off.
Erk...
+ Justin
>
> --
>
> #======================================================================#
> # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
> # Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
> #================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
>
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
--
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there." - Indira Gandhi
