I'm not sure its a problem. The source code already contains the
copyright, and this only affects the JDBC driver. Perhaps we just need
to put in the JDBC driver readme file that parts were provided by
Exolab?
I guess, it all depends on who defines "due credit". The code was
submitted by Assaf Arkin <arkin@exoffice.com>. Who gets to ask?
On Wed, 2002-01-02 at 15:05, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Barry Lind wrote:
> >
> > A question came up on the jdbc mail list today that I couldn't answer.
> > It involves some code that is in the jdbc cvs tree (and has been for
> > many releases). This code contains the following license terms in each
> > file:
> >
>
> > * 5. Due credit should be given to the Exolab Project
> > *
> > (http://www.exolab.org/).
> > *
> > * OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
> > *
> > * Copyright 1999 (C) Exoffice Technologies Inc. All Rights Reserved.
> > *
> >
>
> Yes, this does seems like a serious problem. Can the original
> contributor be contacted?
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
> pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
> + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
> + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
--
Virtually,
Ned Wolpert <ned.wolpert@knowledgenet.com>
D08C2F45: 28E7 56CB 58AC C622 5A51 3C42 8B2B 2739 D08C 2F45
