Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

1 March 2007

• 01:01   Re: VACUUM and spoiling the buffer manager cache ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 01:11   Re: What is CheckPoint.undo needed for? Bruce Momjian
• 01:16   Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option Jonah H. Harris
• 01:23   Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option J. Andrew Rogers
• 02:06   Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option Jonah H. Harris
• 02:35   Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option Jonah H. Harris
• 02:37   POSTGRES WAL Mageshwaran
• 02:40   Re: SOC & user quotas Robert Treat
• 02:42   Re: SOC & user quotas Sergey E. Koposov
• 02:47   Re: POSTGRES WAL Takayuki Tsunakawa
• 02:48   Re: [GENERAL] urgent: upgraded to 8.2, getting kernel panics Bruno Wolff III
• 02:53   Re: POSTGRES WAL Jonah H. Harris
• 02:53   Re: [GENERAL] urgent: upgraded to 8.2, getting kernel panics Bruno Wolff III
• 03:19   Re: POSTGRES WAL Mageshwaran
• 03:33   Re: Packed short varlenas, what next? Gregory Stark
• 03:49   Re: Resumable vacuum proposal and design overview Galy Lee
• 04:04   Is there a way to run heap_insert() AFTER ExecInsertIndexTuples() ? Zoltan Boszormenyi
• 04:20   Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option Jonah H. Harris
• 04:26   Re: POSTGRES WAL Mageshwaran
• 04:51   Re: Packed short varlenas, what next? Tom Lane
• 05:05   Re: POSTGRES WAL Josh Berkus
• 05:06   Re: Is there a way to run heap_insert() AFTER ExecInsertIndexTuples() ? Tom Lane
• 05:17   Re: Resumable vacuum proposal and design overview Tom Lane
• 05:35   Possible BUG in -head with stats Joshua D. Drake
• 06:05   Re: Is there a way to run heap_insert() AFTER ExecInsertIndexTuples() ? Zoltan Boszormenyi
• 07:00   Postgres Replication Mageshwaran
• 07:53   Re: SOC & user quotas Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD
• 08:11   Re: VACUUM and spoiling the buffer manager cache Simon Riggs
• 08:15   Re: Packed short varlenas, what next? Gregory Stark
• 08:22   Re: Postgres Replication Andrew Dunstan
• 08:45   Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD
• 09:04   Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option Gregory Stark
• 09:26   Re: Is there a way to run heap_insert() AFTER ExecInsertIndexTuples() ? Florian G. Pflug
• 09:48   Re: Is there a way to run heap_insert() AFTER ExecInsertIndexTuples() ? Zoltan Boszormenyi
• 09:51   Re: Is there a way to run heap_insert() AFTER ExecInsertIndexTuples() ? Zoltan Boszormenyi
• 09:54   Re: Packed short varlenas, what next? Denis Lussier
• 10:13   Re: Is there a way to run heap_insert() AFTER ExecInsertIndexTuples() ? Florian G. Pflug
• 11:05   Revitalising VACUUM FULL for 8.3 Simon Riggs
• 11:06   Re: Is there a way to run heap_insert() AFTER ExecInsertIndexTuples() ? Zoltan Boszormenyi
• 11:20   Re: POSTGRES WAL Vishal Arora
• 11:21   Re: Revitalising VACUUM FULL for 8.3 Csaba Nagy
• 11:32   Re: Revitalising VACUUM FULL for 8.3 Hannu Krosing
• 11:43   Re: Revitalising VACUUM FULL for 8.3 Hannu Krosing
• 11:59   Re: Revitalising VACUUM FULL for 8.3 Simon Riggs
• 12:04   Re: Revitalising VACUUM FULL for 8.3 Csaba Nagy
• 12:08   Re: Revitalising VACUUM FULL for 8.3 Simon Riggs
• 12:17   Re: Revitalising VACUUM FULL for 8.3 Simon Riggs
• 12:24   Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD
• 12:28   Re: Resumable vacuum proposal and design overview Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD
• 12:33   Re: urgent: upgraded to 8.2, getting kernel panics Merlin Moncure
• 12:34   Re: Postgres Replication Joshua D. Drake
• 12:35   Re: Revitalising VACUUM FULL for 8.3 Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD
• 12:40   Re: Revitalising VACUUM FULL for 8.3 Hannu Krosing
• 12:45   Re: Revitalising VACUUM FULL for 8.3 Simon Riggs
• 12:49   HOT - preliminary results Pavan Deolasee
• 12:50   Re: urgent: upgraded to 8.2, getting kernel panics Magnus Hagander
• 12:50   Re: Is there a way to run heap_insert() AFTER ExecInsertIndexTuples() ? Zoltan Boszormenyi
• 12:52   Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option Heikki Linnakangas
• 12:52   Re: Resumable vacuum proposal and design overview Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD
• 13:01   HOT WIP Patch - version 4.0 Pavan Deolasee
• 13:03   Re: Revitalising VACUUM FULL for 8.3 Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD
• 13:23   Re: [PATCHES] WIP Patch - Updateable Cursors Simon Riggs
• 13:28   CLUSTER, using SHARE UPDATE EXCLUSIVE lock? Jonathan Scher
• 13:46   Updated propsoal for read-only queries on PITR slaves (SoC 2007) Florian G. Pflug
• 13:55   Re: Revitalising VACUUM FULL for 8.3 Hannu Krosing
• 14:10   Re: Resumable vacuum proposal and design overview Jim C. Nasby
• 14:11   Re: Resumable vacuum proposal and design overview Heikki Linnakangas
• 14:13   Re: HOT - preliminary results Pavan Deolasee
• 14:25   Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option Jim C. Nasby
• 14:31   Re: CLUSTER, using SHARE UPDATE EXCLUSIVE lock? Tom Lane
• 14:43   Re: HOT - preliminary results Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD
• 14:45   Re: Dead Space Map version 2 Jim C. Nasby
• 14:48   Re: Revitalising VACUUM FULL for 8.3 Joshua D. Drake
• 14:52   Parallel Query postgres-001@os10000.net
• 15:04   Re: Is there a way to run heap_insert() AFTER ExecInsertIndexTuples() ? Tom Lane
• 15:35   Re: HOT - preliminary results Merlin Moncure
• 16:00   Re: Is there a way to run heap_insert() AFTER ExecInsertIndexTuples() ? Zoltan Boszormenyi
• 16:05   Re: HOT - preliminary results Pavan Deolasee
• 16:23   Re: CLUSTER, using SHARE UPDATE EXCLUSIVE lock? Jonathan Scher
• 16:48   Re: New feature request: FlashBack Query August Zajonc
• 17:48   Re: CLUSTER, using SHARE UPDATE EXCLUSIVE lock? Martijn van Oosterhout
• 18:12   Re: Possible Bug: high CPU usage for stats collector in 8.2 Darcy Buskermolen
• 18:35   Google SoC: lots of discussion, very few mentors Josh Berkus
• 18:54   Re: HOT - preliminary results Simon Riggs
• 18:57   Re: Possible Bug: high CPU usage for stats collector in 8.2 Tom Lane
• 19:08   Re: Google SoC: lots of discussion, very few mentors Andrew Dunstan
• 19:14   Re: Google SoC: lots of discussion, very few mentors Josh Berkus
• 19:20   Re: Possible Bug: high CPU usage for stats collector in 8.2 Andrew Dunstan
• 19:43   Re: Possible Bug: high CPU usage for stats collector in 8.2 Tom Lane
• 19:53   Re: Possible Bug: high CPU usage for stats collector in 8.2 Andrew Dunstan
• 19:59   Re: SOC & user quotas Jim C. Nasby
• 20:01   Re: Possible Bug: high CPU usage for stats collector in 8.2 Tom Lane
• 20:09   Removing some of the old VC++ stuff Magnus Hagander
• 20:21   Re: SOC & user quotas Jeff Davis
• 20:45   Re: SOC & user quotas Tom Lane
• 21:06   Re: SOC & user quotas Andrew Dunstan
• 21:14   Re: SOC & user quotas Joshua D. Drake
• 21:28   Re: SOC & user quotas Tom Lane
• 21:35   Re: SOC & user quotas Andrew Dunstan
• 21:38   Re: SOC & user quotas Jeff Davis
• 21:54   Re: SOC & user quotas Tom Lane
• 22:13   Re: [PATCHES] WIP Patch - Updateable Cursors FAST PostgreSQL
• 22:45   Re: Removing some of the old VC++ stuff Hiroshi Saito
• 22:57   Re: SOC & user quotas Jeff Davis
• 23:32   Re: SOC & user quotas Sergey E. Koposov

2 March 2007

• 00:09   Re: SOC & user quotas Tom Lane
• 00:22   Re: SOC & user quotas Sergey E. Koposov
• 00:27   Re: SOC & user quotas Jeff Davis
• 02:31   Re: Revitalising VACUUM FULL for 8.3 Jim C. Nasby
• 02:36   Re: Revitalising VACUUM FULL for 8.3 Jim C. Nasby
• 04:30   Re: Compilation errors Tom Lane
• 04:31   broken doc Tatsuo Ishii
• 04:32   broken doc Tatsuo Ishii
• 05:02   Re: broken doc Tom Lane
• 05:06   Re: broken doc Tatsuo Ishii
• 05:42   Re: [PATCHES] - WIP Patch Updatable Cursor John Bartlett
• 06:01   Re: HOT - preliminary results Pavan Deolasee
• 06:06   Re: [GENERAL] Fun with Cursors- how to rewind a cursor Tom Lane
• 06:11   Re: HOT - preliminary results Tatsuo Ishii
• 06:29   hex integer input Jeremy Drake
• 06:38   Re: hex integer input Tom Lane
• 06:57   Re: hex integer input Jeremy Drake
• 07:54   xlogViewer / xlogdump Vishal Arora
• 09:34   Re: CLUSTER, using SHARE UPDATE EXCLUSIVE lock? Jonathan Scher
• 09:48   Re: xlogViewer / xlogdump Vishal Arora
• 10:05   HOT - whats next ? Pavan Deolasee
• 12:51   Re: xlogViewer / xlogdump Jonah H. Harris
• 12:59   UPSERT Jonathan Scher
• 13:35   Re: UPSERT Andrew Dunstan
• 13:49   Re: UPSERT Florian G. Pflug
• 14:08   Re: UPSERT Gregory Stark
• 14:08   Re: HOT - whats next ? Tom Lane
• 14:14   Re: UPSERT Tom Lane
• 14:32   Re: HOT - whats next ? Pavan Deolasee
• 14:42   Re: UPSERT Heikki Linnakangas
• 15:02   Re: UPSERT Florian G. Pflug
• 15:23   GIST and TOAST Gregory Stark
• 16:04   Re: HOT - preliminary results Pavan Deolasee
• 16:30   Re: HOT - whats next ? Simon Riggs
• 16:52   Patch license update to developer's FAQ Bruce Momjian
• 17:03   Re: UPSERT Simon Riggs
• 17:20   Re: UPSERT Bricklen Anderson
• 17:20   Re: UPSERT Tom Lane
• 17:27   Re: Updated propsoal for read-only queries on PITRslaves (SoC 2007) Simon Riggs
• 17:29   Re: Patch license update to developer's FAQ Joshua D. Drake
• 17:39   Re: UPSERT Tom Lane
• 17:41   Re: GIST and TOAST Andrew - Supernews
• 17:42   Re: UPSERT Simon Riggs
• 17:47   Re: Expanding DELETE/UPDATE returning Bruno Wolff III
• 17:49   Re: GIST and TOAST Tom Lane
• 17:52   Re: Patch license update to developer's FAQ Bruce Momjian
• 17:54   WITH/RECURSIVE plans Joshua D. Drake
• 17:57   Re: Patch license update to developer's FAQ Joshua D. Drake
• 17:59   Re: SOC & user quotas Robert Treat
• 18:03   Re: UPSERT Bricklen Anderson
• 18:09   Re: WITH/RECURSIVE plans David Fetter
• 18:17   Re: UPSERT Josh Berkus
• 18:28   Re: GIST and TOAST Andrew - Supernews
• 19:03   Re: WITH/RECURSIVE plans Joshua D. Drake
• 19:08   Re: Google SoC: lots of discussion, very few mentors Oleg Bartunov
• 19:52   Re: HOT - preliminary results Bruce Momjian
• 19:52   Re: HOT - preliminary results Bruce Momjian
• 19:53   Re: HOT - preliminary results Bruce Momjian
• 20:37   Re: HOT - preliminary results Alvaro Herrera
• 20:44   Re: WITH/RECURSIVE plans Joshua D. Drake
• 20:44   Re: Possible Bug: high CPU usage for stats collector in 8.2 Darcy Buskermolen
• 21:12   Re: proposal: only superuser can change customized_options Andrew Dunstan
• 21:15   Re: Possible Bug: high CPU usage for stats collector in 8.2 Larry Rosenman
• 21:16   Re: HOT - preliminary results Simon Riggs
• 21:38   Re: Is there a way to run heap_insert() AFTER ExecInsertIndexTuples() ? Bruno Wolff III
• 21:50   Re: HOT - preliminary results Alvaro Herrera
• 21:58   Re: Removing some of the old VC++ stuff Bruce Momjian
• 22:03   Re: Synchronized Scan update Jeff Davis
• 22:35   SE-Linux/PostgreSQL work? Josh Berkus
• 22:39   Re: broken doc Bruce Momjian
• 22:41   Arrays of Complex Types David Fetter
• 22:43   Re: broken doc Tom Lane
• 22:46   Re: broken doc Joshua D. Drake
• 22:46   Re: Synchronized Scan update Josh Berkus
• 23:01   Re: Arrays of Complex Types Tom Lane
• 23:25   Re: Synchronized Scan update Jeff Davis
• 23:35   Re: Synchronized Scan update Josh Berkus
• 23:42   Re: Arrays of Complex Types Andrew Dunstan
• 23:45   Re: Is there a way to run heap_insert() AFTER ExecInsertIndexTuples() ? Florian G. Pflug

3 March 2007

• 00:27   Re: SE-Linux/PostgreSQL work? KaiGai Kohei
• 01:44   Re: Deadlock with pg_dump? Bruce Momjian
• 01:58   Re: HOT - whats next ? Bruce Momjian
• 02:13   Re: HOT - whats next ? Joshua D. Drake
• 02:16   FYI - another open source tpc-c kit Mark Wong
• 02:16   Re: Patch license update to developer's FAQ Bruce Momjian
• 02:26   Re: FYI - another open source tpc-c kit Jonah H. Harris
• 02:35   Re: FYI - another open source tpc-c kit Joshua D. Drake
• 02:43   Re: FYI - another open source tpc-c kit Jonah H. Harris
• 02:54   Re: FYI - another open source tpc-c kit Joshua D. Drake
• 05:08   Re: FYI - another open source tpc-c kit Mark Wong
• 06:46   Re: Patch license update to developer's FAQ Peter Eisentraut
• 06:50   Re: broken doc Warren Turkal
• 07:59   Re: broken doc Peter Eisentraut
• 07:59   Re: broken doc Peter Eisentraut
• 10:49   Re: broken doc Andrew Dunstan
• 12:15   Re: Arrays of Complex Types Martijn van Oosterhout
• 12:32   PostgreSQL - 'SKYLINE OF' clause added! ranbeer makin
• 12:41   Re: PostgreSQL - 'SKYLINE OF' clause added! Martijn van Oosterhout
• 13:06   Re: Arrays of Complex Types Andrew Dunstan
• 13:10   Re: PostgreSQL - 'SKYLINE OF' clause added! Andrew Dunstan
• 13:12   Re: PostgreSQL - 'SKYLINE OF' clause added! ranbeer makin
• 13:20   Re: PostgreSQL - 'SKYLINE OF' clause added! Shane Ambler
• 15:12   Re: Patch license update to developer's FAQ Bruce Momjian
• 16:11   Re: Patch license update to developer's FAQ Joshua D. Drake
• 16:12   Re: Patch license update to developer's FAQ Bruce Momjian
• 16:15   Re: PostgreSQL - 'SKYLINE OF' clause added! Joshua D. Drake
• 16:16   Re: Patch license update to developer's FAQ Joshua D. Drake
• 16:16   Re: Patch license update to developer's FAQ Joshua D. Drake
• 16:17   Re: Patch license update to developer's FAQ Bruce Momjian
• 16:23   Re: Patch license update to developer's FAQ Joshua D. Drake
• 16:25   Re: Arrays of Complex Types David Fetter
• 16:45   Re: Arrays of Complex Types Gregory Stark
• 17:00   Re: Patch license update to developer's FAQ Alvaro Herrera
• 17:02   Re: Patch license update to developer's FAQ Joshua D. Drake
• 17:38   New Access Method Alan Gatt
• 17:49   Re: Deadlock with pg_dump? Bruce Momjian
• 17:59   Re: New Access Method Joshua D. Drake
• 18:15   PL/Python warnings in CVS HEAD Neil Conway
• 18:21   Re: PL/Python warnings in CVS HEAD Joshua D. Drake
• 18:25   Re: PL/Python warnings in CVS HEAD Joshua D. Drake
• 18:29   Re: PL/Python warnings in CVS HEAD Neil Conway
• 18:46   Re: New Access Method Martijn van Oosterhout
• 19:03   Re: What is CheckPoint.undo needed for? Bruce Momjian
• 19:04   Re: What is CheckPoint.undo needed for? Bruce Momjian
• 22:10   Re: New Access Method Alvaro Herrera
• 22:25   Re: Patch license update to developer's FAQ Robert Treat
• 23:49   Re: Arrays of Complex Types Andrew Dunstan

4 March 2007

• 03:19   Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option Robert Treat
• 03:49   Re: Patch license update to developer's FAQ Joshua D. Drake
• 06:54   Re: New Access Method Alan Gatt
• 07:33   Re: New Access Method Alan Gatt
• 09:37   Re: New Access Method Martijn van Oosterhout
• 10:00   Re: ERROR: operator does not exist: integer !=- integer Andrew - Supernews
• 10:57   Re: Synchronized Scan update Simon Riggs
• 11:58   Re: UPSERT Hannu Krosing
• 12:47   Re: UPSERT Bruno Wolff III
• 12:55   Re: UPSERT Hannu Krosing
• 14:25   Re: UPSERT Petr Jelinek
• 14:50   Re: UPSERT Martijn van Oosterhout
• 14:56   Re: ERROR: operator does not exist: integer !=- integer Shane Ambler
• 16:52   Trivial HugeTLB Benchmark Ryan Cumming
• 16:52   ERROR: operator does not exist: integer !=- integer William ZHANG
• 17:07   Re: ERROR: operator does not exist: integer !=- integer Tom Lane
• 17:14   Re: Trivial HugeTLB Benchmark Tom Lane
• 17:32   Re: Synchronized Scan update Joshua D. Drake
• 17:48   Re: New Access Method Tom Lane
• 17:51   Re: ERROR: operator does not exist: integer !=- integer Joshua D. Drake
• 18:11   Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Luke Lonergan

5 March 2007

• 00:36   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Tom Lane
• 01:32   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Luke Lonergan
• 01:35   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Luke Lonergan
• 03:10   Automatic adjustment of bgwriter_lru_maxpages (was: Dead Space Map version 2) ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 04:05   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Mark Kirkwood
• 04:18   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Gavin Sherry
• 04:53   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Luke Lonergan
• 05:26   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Tom Lane
• 07:25   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Tom Lane
• 07:29   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Luke Lonergan
• 07:31   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Luke Lonergan
• 07:39   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Grzegorz Jaskiewicz
• 07:45   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Tom Lane
• 07:52   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Luke Lonergan
• 08:09   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Heikki Linnakangas
• 08:10   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Hannu Krosing
• 08:15   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Tom Lane
• 08:20   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Florian Weimer
• 08:42   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Hannu Krosing
• 08:48   Restartable VACUUM design overview version 2 Galy Lee
• 08:59   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Luke Lonergan
• 09:00   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Mark Kirkwood
• 09:04   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Luke Lonergan
• 09:11   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Gregory Stark
• 09:14   Aggressive freezing in lazy-vacuum ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 09:32   Stream bitmaps Heikki Linnakangas
• 10:11   Re: Stream bitmaps Gavin Sherry
• 10:32   XQuery or XPathサポート Tatsuo Ishii
• 10:51   Re: [HACKERS] XQuery or XPathサポート Nikolay Samokhvalov
• 11:05   Re: Re: [HACKERS] XQuery orXPathサポート Tatsuo Ishii
• 11:24   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [HACKERS] XQuery or XPathサポート Nikolay Samokhvalov
• 11:31   [ANN] SE-PostgreSQL 8.2.3-1.0 alpha release KaiGai Kohei
• 11:42   Re: Re: [HACKERS] XQuery orXPathサポート Tatsuo Ishii
• 11:54   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [HACKERS] XQuery or XPathサポート Nikolay Samokhvalov
• 13:05   Re: PrivateRefCount (for 8.3) NikhilS
• 14:19   Latest plans for Utilities with HOT Simon Riggs
• 15:02   Re: Aggressive freezing in lazy-vacuum Tom Lane
• 15:06   Re: HOT - whats next ? Simon Riggs
• 15:11   Re: Latest plans for Utilities with HOT Pavan Deolasee
• 15:28   Re: PrivateRefCount (for 8.3) Tom Lane
• 15:29   proposal: custom variables management Pavel Stehule
• 15:29   Re: GIST and TOAST Teodor Sigaev
• 15:35   Re: Latest plans for Utilities with HOT Simon Riggs
• 15:51   Re: HOT - whats next ? Tom Lane
• 15:54   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Tom Lane
• 15:55   Re: Latest plans for Utilities with HOT Pavan Deolasee
• 15:57   Re: HOT - whats next ? Simon Riggs
• 16:23   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Pavan Deolasee
• 16:28   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Luke Lonergan
• 16:30   Re: HOT - whats next ? Andrew Dunstan
• 16:41   Re: HOT - whats next ? Simon Riggs
• 16:44   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Tom Lane
• 17:06   Re: PrivateRefCount (for 8.3) Stefan Kaltenbrunner
• 17:20   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Josh Berkus
• 17:21   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Luke Lonergan
• 17:25   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Tom Lane
• 17:39   Re: Synchronized Scan update Jeff Davis
• 17:45   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Luke Lonergan
• 17:46   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Josh Berkus
• 17:46   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Pavan Deolasee
• 17:56   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Tom Lane
• 18:02   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Gregory Stark
• 18:22   Re: Aggressive freezing in lazy-vacuum Florian G. Pflug
• 18:30   Re: [PATCHES] Aggressive freezing in lazy-vacuum Heikki Linnakangas
• 18:33   My time off Bruce Momjian
• 18:37   Re: [PATCHES] Aggressive freezing in lazy-vacuum Florian G. Pflug
• 18:37   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Simon Riggs
• 18:42   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Tom Lane
• 18:43   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Luke Lonergan
• 18:49   Time-correlated columns in large tables Jeroen T. Vermeulen
• 19:09   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Simon Riggs
• 19:11   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Jeff Davis
• 19:12   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Jeff Davis
• 19:17   Re: Time-correlated columns in large tables Heikki Linnakangas
• 19:19   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Tom Lane
• 19:20   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Jeff Davis
• 19:24   Re: proposal: custom variables management Tom Lane
• 19:30   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Tom Lane
• 19:39   Re: Time-correlated columns in large tables Jeroen T. Vermeulen
• 19:45   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Jeff Davis
• 19:46   Re: HOT - whats next ? Tom Lane
• 19:56   Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option A.M.
• 19:56   Re: proposal: custom variables management Pavel Stehule
• 20:03   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Tom Lane
• 20:04   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Heikki Linnakangas
• 20:28   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Mark Kirkwood
• 20:37   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Tom Lane
• 20:43   Re: proposal: custom variables management Andrew Dunstan
• 21:03   Re: proposal: custom variables management Pavel Stehule
• 21:08   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Mark Kirkwood
• 21:20   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Tom Lane
• 21:25   xml2 contrib patch supporting default XML namespaces Mike Rylander
• 21:32   Re: proposal: custom variables management Andrew Dunstan
• 21:43   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Jeff Davis
• 21:45   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add GUC temp_tablespaces to provide a default location for Tom Lane
• 22:09   Re: proposal: custom variables management Tom Lane
• 22:49   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Florian G. Pflug
• 22:54   Re: proposal: custom variables management Andrew Dunstan
• 23:07   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Mark Kirkwood
• 23:43   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Tom Lane

6 March 2007

• 00:31   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Gregory Stark
• 00:42   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Luke Lonergan
• 01:32   Re: [PATCHES] Marc G. Fournier
• 01:39   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Tom Lane
• 01:51   Re: [PATCHES] Gavin Sherry
• 01:59   Re: [PATCHES] Tom Lane
• 02:34   Re: Log levels for checkpoint/bgwriter monitoring Greg Smith
• 02:39   Re: Log levels for checkpoint/bgwriter monitoring Greg Smith
• 02:58   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Tom Lane
• 03:16   Re: proposal: custom variables management Tom Lane
• 03:23   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Luke Lonergan
• 03:56   Re: PL/Python warnings in CVS HEAD Neil Conway
• 04:18   Re: PL/Python warnings in CVS HEAD Tom Lane
• 04:29   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Tom Lane
• 05:38   Re: proposal: custom variables management Pavel Stehule
• 05:44   Re: proposal: custom variables management David Fetter
• 05:47   Re: PrivateRefCount (for 8.3) NikhilS
• 05:50   Re: Updated propsoal for read-only queries on PITR slaves (SoC 2007) Jim Nasby
• 05:50   Re: Possible Bug: high CPU usage for stats collector in 8.2 Jim Nasby
• 05:50   Re: PostgreSQL - 'SKYLINE OF' clause added! Jim Nasby
• 05:50   Re: Restartable VACUUM design overview version 2 Jim Nasby
• 05:50   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Jim Nasby
• 05:50   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Jim Nasby
• 06:15   Re: Possible Bug: high CPU usage for stats collector in 8.2 Tom Lane
• 06:17   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Tom Lane
• 07:17   Re: PL/Python warnings in CVS HEAD Neil Conway
• 07:17   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Simon Riggs
• 07:20   user-defined tree methods in GIST sharath kumar
• 07:49   Re: [PATCHES] xml2 contrib patch supporting default XML namespaces Peter Eisentraut
• 08:12   Re: [PATCHES] xml2 contrib patch supporting default XML namespaces Nikolay Samokhvalov
• 09:03   Re: Aggressive freezing in lazy-vacuum ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 09:04   Re: PL/Python warnings in CVS HEAD Marko Kreen
• 09:15   A Survey on Defect Management Practices in Free/Open Source Software Anu Gupta DCSA
• 10:17   Re: Aggressive freezing in lazy-vacuum Gregory Stark
• 10:36   Re: user-defined tree methods in GIST Martijn van Oosterhout
• 10:57   Auto creation of Partitions NikhilS
• 11:05   Re: Latest plans for Utilities with HOT Simon Riggs
• 11:28   Re: Updated propsoal for read-only queries on PITR slaves (SoC 2007) Florian G. Pflug
• 11:40   Re: Auto creation of Partitions Peter Eisentraut
• 11:42   Re: GIST and TOAST Gregory Stark
• 12:01   Re: [PATCHES] xml2 contrib patch supporting default XML namespaces Mike Rylander
• 12:02   Re: Auto creation of Partitions NikhilS
• 12:09   Re: [PATCHES] xml2 contrib patch supporting default XML namespaces Mike Rylander
• 12:58   Re: Auto creation of Partitions Gregory Stark
• 13:14   Re: Auto creation of Partitions NikhilS
• 13:17   Re: Auto creation of Partitions NikhilS
• 13:58   Re: GIST and TOAST Andrew - Supernews
• 14:02   Re: Aggressive freezing in lazy-vacuum Tom Lane
• 14:08   Re: GIST and TOAST Teodor Sigaev
• 14:14   Re: user-defined tree methods in GIST Teodor Sigaev
• 14:39   Re: Log levels for checkpoint/bgwriter monitoring Jim Nasby
• 14:58   Calculated view fields (8.1 != 8.2) Gaetano Mendola
• 15:12   Re: Trivial HugeTLB Benchmark Ryan Cumming
• 15:12   Re: GIST and TOAST Gregory Stark
• 15:12   NTA access on Solaris Sherry Moore
• 15:12   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Sherry Moore
• 15:13   Re: ERROR: operator does not exist: integer !=- integer William ZHANG
• 15:13   Re: NTA access on Solaris Sherry Moore
• 15:13   Re: NTA access on Solaris Sherry Moore
• 15:16   Re: Auto creation of Partitions Shane Ambler
• 15:22   Re: GIST and TOAST Gregory Stark
• 15:28   Re: PostgreSQL - 'SKYLINE OF' clause added! David Fetter
• 15:31   Re: GIST and TOAST Gregory Stark
• 15:43   Re: Synchronized Scan update Josh Berkus
• 15:44   Re: GIST and TOAST Teodor Sigaev
• 15:48   Re: GIST and TOAST Teodor Sigaev
• 15:55   Re: GIST and TOAST Gregory Stark
• 16:04   Re: PostgreSQL - 'SKYLINE OF' clause added! Chris Browne
• 16:04   Re: Auto creation of Partitions Chris Browne
• 16:10   Re: GIST and TOAST Teodor Sigaev
• 16:23   Plan invalidation vs. unnamed prepared statements Tom Lane
• 16:23   Re: PostgreSQL - 'SKYLINE OF' clause added! Josh Berkus
• 16:43   Re: Auto creation of Partitions Martijn van Oosterhout
• 16:47   Re: Calculated view fields (8.1 != 8.2) Tom Lane
• 16:48   Re: GIST and TOAST Gregory Stark
• 16:56   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Jeff Davis
• 17:01   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Tom Lane
• 17:03   Re: PostgreSQL - 'SKYLINE OF' clause added! Tom Lane
• 17:04   Re: Plan invalidation vs. unnamed prepared statements Gregory Stark
• 17:10   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Jeff Davis
• 17:14   Re: Plan invalidation vs. unnamed prepared statements Tom Lane
• 17:27   Re: Auto creation of Partitions Florian G. Pflug
• 17:29   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Heikki Linnakangas
• 17:35   Re: Auto creation of Partitions Peter Eisentraut
• 17:43   Re: PostgreSQL - 'SKYLINE OF' clause added! Josh Berkus
• 17:44   Re: Auto creation of Partitions Josh Berkus
• 17:44   Re: Auto creation of Partitions Tom Lane
• 17:45   Re: [JDBC] Plan invalidation vs. unnamed prepared statements Dave Cramer
• 17:45   Re: GIST and TOAST Teodor Sigaev
• 17:48   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Heikki Linnakangas
• 18:04   Re: Auto creation of Partitions Josh Berkus
• 18:20   Re: Plan invalidation vs. unnamed prepared statements andyk
• 19:10   Re: PostgreSQL - 'SKYLINE OF' clause added! Alvaro Herrera
• 19:35   Re: Auto creation of Partitions Andrew Dunstan
• 20:06   Re: Arrays of Complex Types David Fetter
• 20:14   Re: Arrays of Complex Types Tom Lane
• 20:17   Re: Arrays of Complex Types David Fetter
• 20:24   Re: Arrays of Complex Types Tom Lane
• 20:27   Re: Arrays of Complex Types David Fetter
• 21:14   Re: Auto creation of Partitions Joris Dobbelsteen
• 21:30   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Simon Riggs
• 22:07   Re: Plan invalidation vs. unnamed prepared statements Simon Riggs
• 22:24   Re: Plan invalidation vs. unnamed prepared statements Tom Lane
• 22:36   Re: GIST and TOAST Gregory Stark
• 23:28   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Jeff Davis
• 23:33   Re: PostgreSQL - 'SKYLINE OF' clause added! Gavin Sherry
• 23:44   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Jim Nasby
• 23:48   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Jim Nasby

7 March 2007

• 00:56   Re: Aggressive freezing in lazy-vacuum ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 01:11   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Jeff Davis
• 01:18   Re: Aggressive freezing in lazy-vacuum ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 01:28   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Jeff Davis
• 02:33   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Luke Lonergan
• 03:14   Re: Log levels for checkpoint/bgwriter monitoring Greg Smith
• 03:35   Re: Aggressive freezing in lazy-vacuum Tom Lane
• 04:11   Re: Log levels for checkpoint/bgwriter monitoring ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 05:40   Re: Auto creation of Partitions NikhilS
• 05:44   Re: Auto creation of Partitions NikhilS
• 06:20   Re: Auto creation of Partitions Stefan Kaltenbrunner
• 06:22   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Hannu Krosing
• 06:50   Re: Auto creation of Partitions Joshua D. Drake
• 07:18   Re: PostgreSQL - 'SKYLINE OF' clause added! Josh Berkus
• 07:49   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Marko Kreen
• 08:01   Re: Auto creation of Partitions Peter Eisentraut
• 09:29   Re: Auto creation of Partitions Simon Riggs
• 09:32   Grouped Index Tuples / Clustered Indexes Heikki Linnakangas
• 10:53   Re: Auto creation of Partitions NikhilS
• 10:53   Re: Grouped Index Tuples / Clustered Indexes Grzegorz Jaskiewicz
• 12:34   Re: Auto creation of Partitions Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD
• 13:02   Re: Grouped Index Tuples / Clustered Indexes Luke Lonergan
• 13:29   Re: Auto creation of Partitions NikhilS
• 13:54   Re: Patch license update to developer's FAQ Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD
• 13:58   Re: Auto creation of Partitions Alvaro Herrera
• 14:14   Re: PostgreSQL - 'SKYLINE OF' clause added! Tom Lane
• 14:24   Re: Auto creation of Partitions Luke Lonergan
• 14:49   Re: GIST and TOAST Gregory Stark
• 14:55   Re: Auto creation of Partitions Simon Riggs
• 15:07   Re: Time-correlated columns in large tables Luke Lonergan
• 15:19   Re: GIST and TOAST Teodor Sigaev
• 15:23   Test report on GENERATED/IDENTITY Zoltan Boszormenyi
• 15:46   Re: Auto creation of Partitions Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD
• 17:17   Bug in VACUUM FULL ? Pavan Deolasee
• 18:42   Re: PostgreSQL - 'SKYLINE OF' clause added! David Fuhry
• 18:58   Re: PostgreSQL - 'SKYLINE OF' clause added! Josh Berkus
• 19:09   Re: Bug in VACUUM FULL ? Tom Lane
• 19:13   Re: Auto creation of Partitions Joris Dobbelsteen
• 20:31   Re: Synchronized Scan update Jim Nasby
• 21:02   Re: Grouped Index Tuples / Clustered Indexes Simon Riggs
• 21:06   Re: WITH/RECURSIVE plans Simon Riggs
• 21:24   Re: Log levels for checkpoint/bgwriter monitoring Jim Nasby
• 21:33   Re: PostgreSQL - 'SKYLINE OF' clause added! Mark Kirkwood
• 21:43   Re: PostgreSQL - 'SKYLINE OF' clause added! Gavin Sherry
• 21:50   Re: PostgreSQL - 'SKYLINE OF' clause added! Luke Lonergan
• 22:00   RFC: changing autovacuum_naptime semantics Alvaro Herrera
• 22:01   Proposed ProcessUtility() API additions Tom Lane
• 22:18   Re: RFC: changing autovacuum_naptime semantics Tom Lane
• 23:40   Re: WITH/RECURSIVE plans Gregory Stark
• 23:49   Re: Proposed ProcessUtility() API additions Gregory Stark

8 March 2007

• 00:01   Re: Grouped Index Tuples / Clustered Indexes Gregory Stark
• 00:09   Re: WITH/RECURSIVE plans Joshua D. Drake
• 00:31   Re: PostgreSQL - 'SKYLINE OF' clause added! Shane Ambler
• 00:54   Re: RFC: changing autovacuum_naptime semantics Galy Lee
• 02:32   Re: Auto creation of Partitions Luke Lonergan
• 03:33   Re: Log levels for checkpoint/bgwriter monitoring Greg Smith
• 04:49   Re: Proposed ProcessUtility() API additions Tom Lane
• 04:53   Re: Auto creation of Partitions Jim Nasby
• 04:53   Re: Auto creation of Partitions Jim Nasby
• 04:53   Re: Auto creation of Partitions Jim Nasby
• 04:53   Re: Trivial HugeTLB Benchmark Jim Nasby
• 04:54   Re: RFC: changing autovacuum_naptime semantics Jim Nasby
• 05:12   Re: PostgreSQL - 'SKYLINE OF' clause added! Tom Lane
• 06:36   Re: Bug in VACUUM FULL ? Pavan Deolasee
• 06:57   HOT WIP Patch - version 4.1 Pavan Deolasee
• 07:10   Re: Auto creation of Partitions NikhilS
• 07:22   Re: Auto creation of Partitions NikhilS
• 07:28   Re: Proposed ProcessUtility() API additions Heikki Linnakangas
• 07:48   Re: Auto creation of Partitions Simon Riggs
• 07:50   Re: Auto creation of Partitions Simon Riggs
• 08:57   WSAStartup() in libpq Magnus Hagander
• 09:12   Re: Auto creation of Partitions Gregory Stark
• 09:22   Re: Auto creation of Partitions Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD
• 10:47   Re: WSAStartup() in libpq Andreas Pflug
• 11:21   Re: WSAStartup() in libpq Magnus Hagander
• 11:43   Re: Bug in VACUUM FULL ? Pavan Deolasee
• 14:10   Re: WSAStartup() in libpq Tom Lane
• 14:28   Re: WSAStartup() in libpq Magnus Hagander
• 14:37   Re: WSAStartup() in libpq Tom Lane
• 14:37   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Sherry Moore
• 14:37   No buffer space available Nik
• 14:37   Re: [JDBC] Plan invalidation vs. unnamed prepared statements Тимчишин Виталий
• 14:44   Estimating seq_page_fetch and random_page_fetch Umar Farooq Minhas
• 14:45    Abrie
• 14:47   Re: WSAStartup() in libpq Magnus Hagander
• 14:49   Re: WSAStartup() in libpq Tom Lane
• 14:58   Re: No buffer space available Andrew Dunstan
• 14:58   Re: Richard Huxton
• 15:47   Re: Estimating seq_page_fetch and random_page_fetch Tom Lane
• 16:34   Re: Estimating seq_page_fetch and random_page_fetch Gregory Stark
• 17:18   Re: RFC: changing autovacuum_naptime semantics Alvaro Herrera
• 17:30   Re: [PATCHES] pg_standby Doug Knight
• 17:36   Re: Calculated view fields (8.1 != 8.2) Gaetano Mendola
• 17:37   Re: [PATCHES] pg_standby Simon Riggs
• 17:44   Re: RFC: changing autovacuum_naptime semantics Alvaro Herrera
• 17:44   Re: Auto creation of Partitions Jim C. Nasby
• 17:51   Re: Auto creation of Partitions Jim C. Nasby
• 17:55   Re: Auto creation of Partitions Jim C. Nasby
• 18:05   Re: PostgreSQL - 'SKYLINE OF' clause added! Nikita
• 18:16   Re: Stream bitmaps Heikki Linnakangas
• 18:19   Re: Estimating seq_page_fetch and random_page_fetch Luke Lonergan
• 18:33   Re: [PATCHES] pg_standby Doug Knight
• 19:10   Re: Auto creation of Partitions Shane Ambler
• 20:09   Re: Estimating seq_page_fetch and random_page_fetch Jim C. Nasby
• 20:17   Re: Acclerating INSERT/UPDATE using UPS Hideyuki Kawashima
• 21:01   Re: Auto creation of Partitions Shane Ambler
• 21:39   Re: Estimating seq_page_fetch and random_page_fetch Neil Conway
• 22:34   Re: Stream bitmaps Gavin Sherry
• 23:31   Re: who gets paid for this Christian Bird
• 23:31   Re: Estimating seq_page_fetch and random_page_fetch Umar Farooq Minhas
• 23:31   who gets paid for this Christian Bird
• 23:44   Re: RFC: changing autovacuum_naptime semantics Galy Lee

9 March 2007

• 00:42   Re: Log levels for checkpoint/bgwriter monitoring ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 01:05   Re: Log levels for checkpoint/bgwriter monitoring ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 04:42   Re: RFC: changing autovacuum_naptime semantics Tom Lane
• 04:51   Re: Log levels for checkpoint/bgwriter monitoring Greg Smith
• 04:51   Re: who gets paid for this Josh Berkus
• 05:18   Re: Auto creation of Partitions NikhilS
• 05:23   Re: Auto creation of Partitions NikhilS
• 05:36   Re: who gets paid for this Tom Lane
• 05:41   Re: RFC: changing autovacuum_naptime semantics Galy Lee
• 05:43   Re: Log levels for checkpoint/bgwriter monitoring Tom Lane
• 06:09   Re: Log levels for checkpoint/bgwriter monitoring ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 06:44   Re: Acclerating INSERT/UPDATE using UPS August Zajonc
• 07:39   Re: RFC: changing autovacuum_naptime semantics Grzegorz Jaskiewicz
• 08:31   Re: Auto creation of Partitions Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD
• 09:00   Re: Calculated view fields (8.1 != 8.2) Gaetano Mendola
• 09:06   A naive question about the Makefile Cao Yu
• 09:58   Re: A naive question about the Makefile Peter Eisentraut
• 10:20   Re: Auto creation of Partitions Simon Riggs
• 10:29   CLUSTER and MVCC Heikki Linnakangas
• 10:33   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove unsafe calling of WSAStartup and WSA Cleanup from DllMain. Magnus Hagander
• 10:55   Re: Auto creation of Partitions NikhilS
• 11:23   Re: who gets paid for this Andrew Dunstan
• 11:25   Re: CLUSTER and MVCC Csaba Nagy
• 11:26   Re: CLUSTER and MVCC Hannu Krosing
• 11:33   Re: CLUSTER and MVCC Simon Riggs
• 11:35   Re: RFC: changing autovacuum_naptime semantics Gregory Stark
• 11:40   Re: Auto creation of Partitions Luke Lonergan
• 11:42   Re: CLUSTER and MVCC Gregory Stark
• 11:49   Re: RFC: changing autovacuum_naptime semantics Alvaro Herrera
• 11:51   Re: CLUSTER and MVCC Csaba Nagy
• 11:58   Re: CLUSTER and MVCC Heikki Linnakangas
• 12:00   Re: CLUSTER and MVCC Alvaro Herrera
• 12:10   Re: CLUSTER and MVCC Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD
• 12:13   Re: CLUSTER and MVCC Csaba Nagy
• 12:15   Re: CLUSTER and MVCC Csaba Nagy
• 12:57   Re: Log levels for checkpoint/bgwriter monitoring Greg Smith
• 12:57   Re: Auto creation of Partitions Simon Riggs
• 12:58   Interaction of PITR backups and Bulk operations avoiding WAL Simon Riggs
• 13:49   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove unsafe calling of WSAStartup and WSA Cleanup from DllMain. Dave Page
• 13:54   Re: Calculated view fields (8.1 != 8.2) Martijn van Oosterhout
• 14:02   Re: Estimating seq_page_fetch and random_page_fetch Martijn van Oosterhout
• 14:10   Re: CLUSTER and MVCC Heikki Linnakangas
• 14:27   Re: Calculated view fields (8.1 != 8.2) Tom Lane
• 14:34   Re: Calculated view fields (8.1 != 8.2) Florian G. Pflug
• 14:40   Re: CLUSTER and MVCC Florian G. Pflug
• 14:42   Re: Calculated view fields (8.1 != 8.2) Gaetano Mendola
• 14:48   Re: CLUSTER and MVCC Heikki Linnakangas
• 14:49   Re: CLUSTER and MVCC Alvaro Herrera
• 14:50   Re: CLUSTER and MVCC Heikki Linnakangas
• 14:50   Re: CLUSTER and MVCC Mike Rylander
• 14:52   Re: CLUSTER and MVCC Heikki Linnakangas
• 14:55   Re: Calculated view fields (8.1 != 8.2) Florian G. Pflug
• 14:58   Re: CLUSTER and MVCC Tom Lane
• 15:00   Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove unsafe calling of WSAStartup and WSA Cleanup from DllMain. Tom Lane
• 15:02   Re: who gets paid for this Bruno Wolff III
• 15:04   Re: CLUSTER and MVCC Simon Riggs
• 15:16   Re: Interaction of PITR backups and Bulk operations avoiding WAL Tom Lane
• 15:27   Re: CLUSTER and MVCC Heikki Linnakangas
• 15:36   Re: Interaction of PITR backups and Bulk operationsavoiding WAL Simon Riggs
• 15:36   Re: CLUSTER and MVCC Tom Lane
• 15:41   Re: CLUSTER and MVCC Heikki Linnakangas
• 15:43   Re: CLUSTER and MVCC Florian G. Pflug
• 15:48   Re: Interaction of PITR backups and Bulk operationsavoiding WAL Tom Lane
• 15:49   Re: CLUSTER and MVCC Florian G. Pflug
• 16:00   Re: Interaction of PITR backups and Bulkoperationsavoiding WAL Simon Riggs
• 16:02   Re: Interaction of PITR backups and Bulk operationsavoiding WAL Andreas Pflug
• 16:06   Re: Interaction of PITR backups and Bulk operationsavoiding WAL Csaba Nagy
• 16:34   Re: Estimating seq_page_fetch and random_page_fetch Grzegorz Jaskiewicz
• 18:32   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Simon Riggs
• 18:39   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Luke Lonergan
• 19:50   Re: who gets paid for this Lukas Kahwe Smith
• 20:34   Re: Log levels for checkpoint/bgwriter monitoring Jim Nasby
• 20:34   Re: Log levels for checkpoint/bgwriter monitoring Jim Nasby
• 20:38   Re: Log levels for checkpoint/bgwriter monitoring Jim Nasby
• 20:40   Re: Bug in VACUUM FULL ? Tom Lane
• 20:41   Re: Auto creation of Partitions Jim Nasby
• 21:17   Re: Auto creation of Partitions Hannu Krosing
• 21:29   Re: who gets paid for this Joshua D. Drake
• 21:30   Re: Bug in VACUUM FULL ? Simon Riggs
• 21:38   autovacuum next steps, take 3 Alvaro Herrera
• 22:00   Re: Bug in VACUUM FULL ? Tom Lane
• 22:02   Re: Bug in VACUUM FULL ? Joshua D. Drake
• 22:40   Re: Log levels for checkpoint/bgwriter monitoring Tom Lane
• 22:52   Re: autovacuum next steps, take 3 Matthew T. O'Connor
• 23:00   Re: who gets paid for this Dave Page
• 23:18   Re: autovacuum next steps, take 3 Tom Lane
• 23:33   Re: Log levels for checkpoint/bgwriter monitoring Greg Smith
• 23:43   Re: Bug in VACUUM FULL ? Gregory Stark
• 23:49   Re: Bug in VACUUM FULL ? Tom Lane
• 23:49   Re: autovacuum next steps, take 3 Matthew T. O'Connor
• 23:56   Re: Log levels for checkpoint/bgwriter monitoring Greg Smith

10 March 2007

• 00:05   Re: Bug in VACUUM FULL ? Gregory Stark
• 00:34   Re: Bug in VACUUM FULL ? Tom Lane
• 01:59   My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties Edward Stanley
• 01:59   Re: Calculated view fields (8.1 != 8.2) Gaetano Mendola
• 02:04   Re: who gets paid for this Christian Bird
• 02:06   Re: msvc failure in largeobject regression test Andrew Dunstan
• 02:06   Re: Calculated view fields (8.1 != 8.2) Gaetano Mendola
• 03:44   Re: Auto creation of Partitions Robert Treat
• 03:59   Re: Auto creation of Partitions NikhilS
• 04:16   Re: Auto creation of Partitions NikhilS
• 04:33   Re: msvc failure in largeobject regression test Tom Lane
• 04:56   Re: Calculated view fields (8.1 != 8.2) Tom Lane
• 07:08   Re: Bug in VACUUM FULL ? Simon Riggs
• 07:29   Re: My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties Heikki Linnakangas
• 08:42   Re: [PATCHES] scan_recycle_buffers Gregory Stark
• 09:41   Recursive Queries and tuplestore.c Gregory Stark
• 10:37   Re: Bug in VACUUM FULL ? Pavan Deolasee
• 10:42   Re: Bug in VACUUM FULL ? Pavan Deolasee
• 11:45   Re: msvc failure in largeobject regression test Andrew Dunstan
• 12:37   Re: [PATCHES] scan_recycle_buffers Simon Riggs
• 15:31   Race condition in pg_database_size() Michael Fuhr
• 15:45   what can be wrong? backport plpgpsm to 8.1 Pavel Stehule
• 16:05   Re: Bug in VACUUM FULL ? Tom Lane
• 16:34   Re: Race condition in pg_database_size() Tom Lane
• 16:37   Re: what can be wrong? backport plpgpsm to 8.1 Tom Lane
• 17:06   Re: Bug in VACUUM FULL ? Pavan Deolasee
• 17:33   Re: Bug in VACUUM FULL ? Pavan Deolasee
• 17:38   Re: Bug in VACUUM FULL ? Gregory Stark
• 18:54   Re: what can be wrong? backport plpgpsm to 8.1 Pavel Stehule
• 19:25   Re: what can be wrong? backport plpgpsm to 8.1 Alvaro Herrera
• 20:06   Re: what can be wrong? backport plpgpsm to 8.1 Tom Lane
• 20:38   Re: what can be wrong? backport plpgpsm to 8.1 Pavel Stehule
• 21:13   Re: [PATCHES] scan_recycle_buffers Simon Riggs
• 21:36   Re: Race condition in pg_database_size() Michael Fuhr
• 21:39   Re: Race condition in pg_database_size() Tom Lane
• 23:15   Why is this allowed? Chuck McDevitt
• 23:40   Re: Why is this allowed? Gregory Stark
• 23:52   Re: Why is this allowed? Gregory Stark

11 March 2007

• 00:11   Re: Why is this allowed? Tom Lane
• 00:37   Re: Why is this allowed? Chuck McDevitt
• 00:53   Re: Why is this allowed? Tom Lane
• 00:58   Re: Why is this allowed? Gavin Sherry
• 03:57   Re: Race condition in pg_database_size() Michael Fuhr
• 04:24   Re: Race condition in pg_database_size() Alvaro Herrera
• 07:32   Re: Why is "osprey" dumping core in REL8_2 branch? Tom Lane
• 09:59   Re: Why is "osprey" dumping core in REL8_2 branch? Rémi Zara
• 11:22   Re: Grouped Index Tuples / Clustered Indexes Heikki Linnakangas
• 15:10   Re: PostgreSQL - 'SKYLINE OF' clause added! Naz Gassiep
• 18:06   Re: Grouped Index Tuples / Clustered Indexes Florian G. Pflug
• 19:47   Re: My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties Josh Berkus
• 19:57   Re: Grouped Index Tuples / Clustered Indexes Simon Riggs
• 20:00   Re: Grouped Index Tuples / Clustered Indexes Simon Riggs

12 March 2007

• 00:18   Updating large postgresql database with blobs CAJ CAJ
• 02:53   Re: Why is "osprey" dumping core in REL8_2 branch? Tom Lane
• 03:20   Re: PostgreSQL - 'SKYLINE OF' clause added! Shane Ambler
• 03:45   Re: PostgreSQL - 'SKYLINE OF' clause added! Tom Lane
• 07:21   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 09:17   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Simon Riggs
• 10:11   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Simon Riggs
• 11:25   Re: autovacuum next steps, take 3 Galy Lee
• 12:53   Re: Grouped Index Tuples / Clustered Indexes Heikki Linnakangas
• 13:24   Re: Synchronized Scan update Simon Riggs
• 14:31   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Tom Lane
• 14:32   Re: autovacuum next steps, take 3 Tom Lane
• 15:14   Re: Auto creation of Partitions Robert Treat
• 15:22   Re: Updating large postgresql database with blobs Andrew Dunstan
• 15:44   Re: Synchronized Scan update Luke Lonergan
• 16:27   Re: Synchronized Scan update Simon Riggs
• 17:29   Re: Updating large postgresql database with blobs CAJ CAJ
• 17:33   To connect a debbuger... Jonathan Scher
• 17:40   Re: Updating large postgresql database with blobs Andrew Dunstan
• 18:09   Re: To connect a debbuger... Gregory Stark
• 18:43   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Simon Riggs
• 19:14   Re: autovacuum next steps, take 3 Alvaro Herrera
• 20:12   Re: autovacuum next steps, take 3 Alvaro Herrera
• 20:18   Re: autovacuum next steps, take 3 Alvaro Herrera
• 22:22   Re: CLUSTER and MVCC Heikki Linnakangas
• 22:50   Inconsistent behavior on select * from void_function()? Josh Berkus
• 22:57   possible de-optimization of multi-column index plans in 8.3 Josh Berkus
• 23:08   Re: Inconsistent behavior on select * from void_function()? Gregory Stark
• 23:11   Re: My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties Andrew Hammond
• 23:23   Re: My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties Josh Berkus
• 23:33   Re: My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties Joshua D. Drake
• 23:44   Re: My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties Richard Huxton
• 23:57   Re: My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties Andrew Hammond

13 March 2007

• 00:05   Re: My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties Richard Huxton
• 00:38   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make configuration parameters fall back to their default values Tom Lane
• 00:44   Re: possible de-optimization of multi-column index plans in 8.3 Tom Lane
• 01:10   Re: My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties Gregory Stark
• 01:13   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make configuration parameters fall back to their default values Gregory Stark
• 01:20   Re: Inconsistent behavior on select * from void_function()? Tom Lane
• 01:21   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make configuration parameters fall back to their default values Andrew Dunstan
• 01:26   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make configuration parameters fall back to their default values Tom Lane
• 01:35   Re: CLUSTER and MVCC Tom Lane
• 01:37   Re: My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties Josh Berkus
• 01:40   Re: autovacuum next steps, take 3 Tom Lane
• 02:14   Re: autovacuum next steps, take 3 Galy Lee
• 02:31   Re: My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties Richard Huxton
• 02:42   Re: Log levels for checkpoint/bgwriter monitoring Greg Smith
• 02:59   Re: autovacuum next steps, take 3 Tom Lane
• 03:02   Re: Log levels for checkpoint/bgwriter monitoring Tom Lane
• 03:44   Re: autovacuum next steps, take 3 ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 04:00   Re: autovacuum next steps, take 3 Tom Lane
• 04:25   Re: autovacuum next steps, take 3 ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 04:40   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 05:17   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Luke Lonergan
• 05:33   Re: My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties Sean Utt
• 08:44   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make configuration parameters fall back to their default values Magnus Hagander
• 08:47   Re: My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties Magnus Hagander
• 09:06   czech national site is moved Pavel Stehule
• 09:14   Re: czech national site is moved Devrim GÜNDÜZ
• 09:18   Re: CLUSTER and MVCC Heikki Linnakangas
• 09:27   Re: My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties Csaba Nagy
• 09:35   Re: My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties Richard Huxton
• 09:40   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Simon Riggs
• 10:11   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Simon Riggs
• 11:01   Bug in UTF8-Validation Code? Mario Weilguni
• 13:46   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make configuration parameters fall back to their default values Andrew Dunstan
• 13:48   Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code? Albe Laurenz
• 13:56   Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code? Mario Weilguni
• 13:57   Re: My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties David Fetter
• 13:59   Re: Major Feature Interactions Merlin Moncure
• 14:13   Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code? Andrew Dunstan
• 14:22   Re: My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties Richard Huxton
• 14:24   Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code? Mario Weilguni
• 14:29   Re: My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties Andrew Dunstan
• 14:37   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Luke Lonergan
• 14:39   Re: My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties Teodor Sigaev
• 14:50   Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code? Albe Laurenz
• 15:12   Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code? Andrew Dunstan
• 15:38   Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code? Joshua D. Drake
• 15:43   Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code? Mario Weilguni
• 15:45   Re: Major Feature Interactions Tom Lane
• 16:20   Daylight Saving Time question PostgreSQL 8.1.4 Michael Ledford
• 16:29   Re: Synchronized Scan update Jeff Davis
• 16:31   Re: Daylight Saving Time question PostgreSQL 8.1.4 Josh Berkus
• 16:44   Re: Daylight Saving Time question PostgreSQL 8.1.4 Martijn van Oosterhout
• 16:50   Re: Daylight Saving Time question PostgreSQL 8.1.4 Tom Lane
• 16:53   Re: Synchronized Scan update Tom Lane
• 17:08   Re: Synchronized Scan update Jeff Davis
• 17:11   Re: Daylight Saving Time question PostgreSQL 8.1.4 Josh Berkus
• 17:14   Re: Daylight Saving Time question PostgreSQL 8.1.4 Michael Ledford
• 17:15   Re: Synchronized Scan update Simon Riggs
• 17:19   Re: Synchronized Scan update Jeff Davis
• 17:20   Re: Synchronized Scan update Simon Riggs
• 17:34   Re: My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties David Fetter
• 17:36   Re: Synchronized Scan update Jeff Davis
• 17:40   Re: Daylight Saving Time question PostgreSQL 8.1.4 Josh Berkus
• 17:42   8.1.x (tested 8.1.8) timezone bugs Joshua D. Drake
• 17:42   Re: Synchronized Scan update Hannu Krosing
• 17:47   Re: 8.1.x (tested 8.1.8) timezone bugs Joshua D. Drake
• 17:52   Re: Daylight Saving Time question PostgreSQL 8.1.4 Zdenek Kotala
• 17:54   Re: My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties Richard Huxton
• 18:02   Re: Daylight Saving Time question PostgreSQL 8.1.4 Josh Berkus
• 18:02   Re: Daylight Saving Time question PostgreSQL 8.1.4 Andrew Dunstan
• 18:07   HOT WIP Patch - Version 4.4 Pavan Deolasee
• 18:14   Re: Daylight Saving Time question PostgreSQL 8.1.4 Tom Lane
• 18:27   Re: My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties David Fetter
• 18:29   Re: Synchronized Scan update Jeff Davis
• 18:45   Re: 8.1.x (tested 8.1.8) timezone bugs Tom Lane
• 18:49   Re: 8.1.x (tested 8.1.8) timezone bugs Joshua D. Drake
• 18:55   Re: 8.1.x (tested 8.1.8) timezone bugs Tom Lane
• 19:10   Re: 8.1.x (tested 8.1.8) timezone bugs Joshua D. Drake
• 19:18   Re: 8.1.x (tested 8.1.8) timezone bugs Tom Lane
• 19:26   Re: 8.1.x (tested 8.1.8) timezone bugs Joshua D. Drake
• 19:28   Re: Synchronized Scan update Simon Riggs
• 19:39   Re: 8.1.x (tested 8.1.8) timezone bugs Tom Lane
• 20:40   Re: Synchronized Scan update Jeff Davis
• 21:16   Re: Synchronized Scan update Simon Riggs
• 21:22   Re: Bug in VACUUM FULL ? Tom Lane

14 March 2007

• 04:13   Re: Log levels for checkpoint/bgwriter monitoring Greg Smith
• 07:01   Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code? Michael Paesold
• 07:30   Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code? Michael Fuhr
• 07:41   Re: Bug in VACUUM FULL ? Pavan Deolasee
• 08:03   Re: My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties tomas@tuxteam.de
• 09:05   Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code? Peter Eisentraut
• 09:22   Re: Synchronized Scan update Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD
• 10:22   Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes Heikki Linnakangas
• 10:35   need help in understanding gist function sharath kumar
• 12:18   Re: Daylight Saving Time question PostgreSQL 8.1.4 Zdenek Kotala
• 13:11   Re: Daylight Saving Time question PostgreSQL 8.1.4 Naz Gassiep
• 14:07   Re: need help in understanding gist function Teodor Sigaev
• 14:24   Re: My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties David Fetter
• 14:28   Re: My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties Gregory Stark
• 14:39   Re: Daylight Saving Time question PostgreSQL 8.1.4 Martijn van Oosterhout
• 14:53   Re: Daylight Saving Time question PostgreSQL 8.1.4 Andrew Dunstan
• 14:56   Re: Daylight Saving Time question PostgreSQL 8.1.4 Zdenek Kotala
• 14:58   Re: Bug in VACUUM FULL ? Tom Lane
• 15:02   Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes Hannu Krosing
• 15:04   Re: Daylight Saving Time question PostgreSQL 8.1.4 Zdenek Kotala
• 15:06   Re: Daylight Saving Time question PostgreSQL 8.1.4 Alvaro Herrera
• 15:08   Re: My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties mark@mark.mielke.cc
• 15:21   Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes Joshua D. Drake
• 15:21   Re: Daylight Saving Time question PostgreSQL 8.1.4 Tom Lane
• 15:24   Re: My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties Joshua D. Drake
• 15:26   Re: My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties Gregory Stark
• 15:27   Re: My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties Csaba Nagy
• 15:32   Re: My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties Andrew Dunstan
• 15:35   Re: My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties mark@mark.mielke.cc
• 15:36   Re: Daylight Saving Time question PostgreSQL 8.1.4 Tom Lane
• 15:39   Re: autovacuum next steps, take 3 Alvaro Herrera
• 15:48   Re: My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties Gregory Stark
• 15:50   Re: My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties David Fetter
• 16:01   Re: My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties Richard Huxton
• 16:10   Re: My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties Csaba Nagy
• 16:26   Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes Alvaro Herrera
• 16:39   hash join hashtable size and work_mem Timothy J. Kordas
• 16:42   Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes Joshua D. Drake
• 16:51   Re: hash join hashtable size and work_mem Tom Lane
• 17:35   Re: hash join hashtable size and work_mem Timothy J. Kordas
• 17:49   Re: hash join hashtable size and work_mem Tom Lane
• 21:45   Re: hash join hashtable size and work_mem Simon Riggs
• 22:46   how to add seconds to a TimestampTz Alvaro Herrera

15 March 2007

• 04:58   Re: how to add seconds to a TimestampTz Tom Lane
• 06:06   UPDATE using sub selects NikhilS
• 06:33   Re: UPDATE using sub selects Tom Lane
• 06:52   Re: UPDATE using sub selects NikhilS
• 08:11   SoC ECPG Enhancements Peter Eisentraut
• 09:48   Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes Heikki Linnakangas
• 09:53   Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes Heikki Linnakangas
• 10:23   where to add/change commands Grzegorz Jaskiewicz
• 10:31   Re: CLUSTER and MVCC Heikki Linnakangas
• 10:36   Re: where to add/change commands Heikki Linnakangas
• 10:38   Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes Heikki Linnakangas
• 10:43   Re: where to add/change commands Grzegorz Jaskiewicz
• 10:46   Re: where to add/change commands NikhilS
• 10:52   Re: where to add/change commands Grzegorz Jaskiewicz
• 11:26   Re: where to add/change commands Peter Eisentraut
• 11:29   Re: where to add/change commands Grzegorz Jaskiewicz
• 12:08   Re: where to add/change commands Gregory Stark
• 12:11   Re: where to add/change commands Grzegorz Jaskiewicz
• 12:40   [RFC] CLUSTER VERBOSE Grzegorz Jaskiewicz
• 13:06   Re: how to add seconds to a TimestampTz Alvaro Herrera
• 13:31   Re: how to add seconds to a TimestampTz Grzegorz Jaskiewicz
• 14:02   Additional global stats for pg_database? Magnus Hagander
• 14:10   Re: My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties Edward Stanley
• 14:10   Re: how to add seconds to a TimestampTz Sailesh Krishnamurthy
• 14:11   Re: Calculated view fields (8.1 != 8.2) Gaetano Mendola
• 14:11   Re: My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties Trent Shipley
• 14:11   Re: My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties Eddie Stanley
• 14:25   Re: how to add seconds to a TimestampTz Alvaro Herrera
• 14:37   Re: Additional global stats for pg_database? Alvaro Herrera
• 14:45   Re: Additional global stats for pg_database? Magnus Hagander
• 14:48   Re: UPDATE using sub selects Gaetano Mendola
• 14:53   Re: Backend crash in 8.2.3 with plpgsql function Gaetano Mendola
• 14:55   Re: CLUSTER and MVCC Tom Lane
• 15:15   Re: CLUSTER and MVCC Heikki Linnakangas
• 15:30   Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes Joshua D. Drake
• 15:31   Re: My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties Ron Mayer
• 15:57   Re: My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties tomas@tuxteam.de
• 16:02   Re: My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties A.M.
• 16:18   tsearch_core for inclusion Teodor Sigaev
• 16:33   Re: My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties Gregory Stark
• 16:48   Re: My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties Csaba Nagy
• 16:49   Re: My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties Andrew Dunstan
• 18:10   Proposal: minor SPI interface change Tom Lane
• 19:49   Re: [RFC] CLUSTER VERBOSE Dawid Kuroczko

16 March 2007

• 01:08   pltcl vs. multilib machines Tom Lane
• 02:36   Re: UPDATE using sub selects Tom Lane
• 03:03   Re: tsearch_core for inclusion Robert Treat
• 03:16   Re: tsearch_core for inclusion Joshua D. Drake
• 03:29   Re: tsearch_core for inclusion Tom Lane
• 03:53   Re: tsearch_core for inclusion Joshua D. Drake
• 04:11   Re: tsearch_core for inclusion Tom Lane
• 04:31   Re: tsearch_core for inclusion Joshua D. Drake
• 05:31   Re: tsearch_core for inclusion Oleg Bartunov
• 05:33   Re: tsearch_core for inclusion Oleg Bartunov
• 05:36   Re: SoC ECPG Enhancements Josh Berkus
• 05:47   Re: My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties tomas@tuxteam.de
• 06:19   Re: tsearch_core for inclusion Magnus Hagander
• 06:56   Re: tsearch_core for inclusion Oleg Bartunov
• 07:44   Re: UPDATE using sub selects NikhilS
• 08:40   Re: tsearch_core for inclusion Teodor Sigaev
• 08:45   Re: tsearch_core for inclusion Teodor Sigaev
• 08:53   Re: [RFC] CLUSTER VERBOSE Heikki Linnakangas
• 08:53   Re: pltcl vs. multilib machines Joe Conway
• 08:54   Lock table in non-volatile functions Gaetano Mendola
• 09:14   Re: [RFC] CLUSTER VERBOSE Grzegorz Jaskiewicz
• 11:18   Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code? Mario Weilguni
• 11:51   Question: pg_class attributes and race conditions ? Pavan Deolasee
• 12:25   Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code? Albe Laurenz
• 13:06   Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code? Andrew Dunstan
• 13:37   Re: tsearch_core for inclusion Robert Treat
• 13:56   Re: My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties Andrew Dunstan
• 14:37   Re: UPDATE using sub selects Tom Lane
• 14:42   Re: tsearch_core for inclusion Tom Lane
• 14:46   Re: tsearch_core for inclusion Teodor Sigaev
• 14:52   Re: Question: pg_class attributes and race conditions ? Alvaro Herrera
• 14:55   Re: Lock table in non-volatile functions Tom Lane
• 14:55   Re: UPDATE using sub selects NikhilS
• 15:01   Re: tsearch_core for inclusion Florian G. Pflug
• 15:09   Re: Question: pg_class attributes and race conditions ? Tom Lane
• 15:12   Re: tsearch_core for inclusion Joshua D. Drake
• 15:24   Re: tsearch_core for inclusion Andrew Dunstan
• 16:17   Re: tsearch_core for inclusion Oleg Bartunov
• 16:20   Re: tsearch_core for inclusion Stefan Kaltenbrunner
• 16:25   Re: tsearch_core for inclusion Florian G. Pflug
• 16:27   Re: Question: pg_class attributes and race conditions ? Pavan Deolasee
• 16:40   Re: Question: pg_class attributes and race conditions ? Tom Lane
• 16:42   Re: New Project: PostGIS application to Missing People Josh Berkus
• 17:15   Re: Question: pg_class attributes and race conditions ? Joshua D. Drake
• 17:22   Re: Question: pg_class attributes and race conditions ? Heikki Linnakangas
• 17:30   Re: Question: pg_class attributes and race conditions ? Pavan Deolasee
• 17:48   Re: Question: pg_class attributes and race conditions ? Simon Riggs
• 18:05   Re: Question: pg_class attributes and race conditions ? Gregory Stark
• 18:14   Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code? Jeff Davis
• 18:20   Re: Question: pg_class attributes and race conditions ? Pavan Deolasee
• 18:24   Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code? Jeff Davis
• 18:38   Re: Question: pg_class attributes and race conditions ? Simon Riggs
• 18:57   Re: Question: pg_class attributes and race conditions ? Joshua D. Drake
• 19:11   Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures Tom Lane
• 19:19   Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes Joshua D. Drake
• 19:22   Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes Joshua D. Drake
• 19:25   Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures Joshua D. Drake
• 19:28   Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes Heikki Linnakangas
• 19:35   Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures Andrew Dunstan
• 19:39   Re: tsearch_core for inclusion Robert Treat
• 19:39   Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures Joshua D. Drake
• 19:41   Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures Tom Lane
• 20:46   Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes Joshua D. Drake
• 20:59   Re: Question: pg_class attributes and race conditions ? Alvaro Herrera
• 21:12   Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes Heikki Linnakangas
• 21:32   Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures Andrew Dunstan
• 21:49   Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures Jeremy Drake
• 21:49   Re: Question: pg_class attributes and race conditions ? Simon Riggs
• 22:09   Re: tsearch_core for inclusion Florian G. Pflug
• 23:07   Adding a typmod field to Const et al Tom Lane
• 23:10   Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures Andrew Dunstan

17 March 2007

• 00:39   Re: Adding a typmod field to Const et al Gregory Stark
• 00:46   Re: Adding a typmod field to Const et al Tom Lane
• 01:17   Re: Lock table in non-volatile functions Gaetano Mendola
• 02:17   Re: Lock table in non-volatile functions Tom Lane
• 04:37   Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes Joshua D. Drake
• 07:13   CREATE INDEX and HOT (was Question: pg_class attributes and race conditions ?) Pavan Deolasee
• 08:39   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT (was Question: pg_classattributes and race conditions ?) Simon Riggs
• 10:11   Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes Grzegorz Jaskiewicz
• 12:44   Re: My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties tomas@tuxteam.de
• 13:38   Bison 2.1 on win32 Magnus Hagander
• 14:12   Re: Bison 2.1 on win32 Andrew Dunstan
• 14:25   Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes Joshua D. Drake
• 14:28   Re: [PATCHES] xpath_array with namespaces support Nikolay Samokhvalov
• 14:48   Re: [PATCHES] xpath_array with namespaces support Andrew Dunstan
• 15:10   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add GUC temp_tablespaces to provide a default location for Jaime Casanova
• 15:30   Re: SoC ECPG Enhancements Michael Meskes
• 15:36   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add GUC temp_tablespaces to provide a default location for Tom Lane
• 15:45   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT (was Question: pg_class attributes and race conditions ?) Tom Lane
• 15:46   Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code? Andrew Dunstan
• 15:53   Re: Bison 2.1 on win32 Tom Lane
• 15:56   Re: [PATCHES] xpath_array with namespaces support Andrew Dunstan
• 16:11   Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code? Tom Lane
• 16:17   Re: Bison 2.1 on win32 Magnus Hagander
• 16:23   Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code? Andrew Dunstan
• 16:45   Re: Bison 2.1 on win32 Magnus Hagander
• 16:52   Re: Bison 2.1 on win32 Tom Lane
• 16:59   Re: Bison 2.1 on win32 Magnus Hagander
• 17:06   Re: Bison 2.1 on win32 Tom Lane
• 17:08   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT (was Question: pg_classattributes and race conditions ?) Simon Riggs
• 17:31   Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code? Tom Lane
• 17:41   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT (was Question: pg_class attributes and race conditions ?) Pavan Deolasee
• 17:51   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT (was Question: pg_classattributes and race conditions ?) Pavan Deolasee
• 17:53   Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code? Tom Lane
• 18:37   Project suggestion: benchmark utility for PostgreSQL Mickael DELOISON
• 19:00   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT (was Question: pg_classattributes and race conditions ?) Simon Riggs
• 19:14   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT (was Question: pg_classattributes and race conditions ?) Pavan Deolasee
• 19:24   Re: Bison 2.1 on win32 Hiroshi Saito
• 20:29   Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code? Andrew Dunstan
• 20:44   Re: Project suggestion: benchmark utility for PostgreSQL Florian G. Pflug
• 21:15   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT (was Question:pg_classattributes and race conditions ?) Simon Riggs
• 21:15   Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes Grzegorz Jaskiewicz
• 22:00   Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code? Tom Lane
• 23:09   Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code? Andrew Dunstan

18 March 2007

• 00:08   Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes Luke Lonergan
• 00:44   Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes Grzegorz Jaskiewicz
• 04:04   Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code? Andrew Dunstan
• 09:32   Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code? Grzegorz Jaskiewicz
• 11:38   Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code? Martijn van Oosterhout
• 12:09   Re: Project suggestion: benchmark utility for PostgreSQL Josh Berkus
• 12:13   Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures Josh Berkus
• 12:26   Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code? Andrew Dunstan
• 13:37   Re: [PATCHES] xpath_array with namespaces support Nikolay Samokhvalov
• 15:27   Re: initdb fails - postgresql does not support leap seconds Eric
• 15:27   Re: initdb fails - postgresql does not support leap seconds Eric
• 15:27   Re: [PATCHES] xpath_array with namespaces support Nikolay Samokhvalov
• 15:27   Re: initdb fails - postgresql does not support leap seconds Eric
• 15:27   TODO item: Improve speed with indexes Aleksis Petrov
• 15:32   New Project: PostGIS application to Missing People Luis Gustavo Lira
• 15:53   Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code? Martijn van Oosterhout
• 16:03   Re: [PATCHES] xml2 contrib patch supporting default XML namespaces Mike Rylander
• 16:54   Re: TODO item: Improve speed with indexes Tom Lane
• 17:40   msvc build broken for ecpg Andrew Dunstan
• 18:00   Re: msvc build broken for ecpg Magnus Hagander
• 18:16   Re: msvc build broken for ecpg Andrew Dunstan
• 18:20   Re: msvc build broken for ecpg Magnus Hagander
• 18:30   ILIKE and indexes Guillaume Smet
• 19:05   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add GUC temp_tablespaces to provide a default location for Jaime Casanova
• 19:17   Re: ILIKE and indexes Martijn van Oosterhout
• 19:51   Re: ILIKE and indexes Guillaume Smet
• 19:55   modifying the tbale function Islam Hegazy
• 20:15   Re: modifying the tbale function Martijn van Oosterhout
• 21:07   Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code? Andrew Dunstan
• 21:26   Re: modifying the tbale function Andrew Dunstan
• 22:57   Re: modifying the tbale function Neil Conway
• 23:10   Re: modifying the tbale function Islam Hegazy
• 23:34   Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code? Gregory Stark

19 March 2007

• 00:35   Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code? Andrew Dunstan
• 03:22   Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures Tom Lane
• 03:34   Re: ILIKE and indexes Tom Lane
• 03:41   Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code? Tom Lane
• 03:50   Re: modifying the tbale function Tom Lane
• 04:44   Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures Joshua D. Drake
• 05:08   Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code? ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 05:11   Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures Jeremy Drake
• 05:40   Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures Tom Lane
• 05:51   Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures Tom Lane
• 06:34   Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures Tom Lane
• 09:03   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT (was Question: pg_classattributes and race conditions ?) Pavan Deolasee
• 09:21   CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Pavan Deolasee
• 09:31   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT (was Question:pg_classattributes and race conditions ?) Simon Riggs
• 09:54   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT (was Question:pg_classattributes and race conditions ?) Simon Riggs
• 10:01   Re: ILIKE and indexes Guillaume Smet
• 10:09   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT (was Question: pg_class attributes and race conditions ?) Heikki Linnakangas
• 10:16   Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes Heikki Linnakangas
• 10:28   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT (was Question: pg_class attributes and race conditions ?) Pavan Deolasee
• 10:37   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT (was Question:pg_classattributes and race conditions ?) Pavan Deolasee
• 10:51   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT (was Question: pg_class attributes and race conditions ?) Heikki Linnakangas
• 11:00   Re: modifying the tbale function Heikki Linnakangas
• 11:25   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT (was Question:pg_classattributes and race conditions ?) Simon Riggs
• 12:08   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT (was Question: pg_classattributes and race conditions ?) Simon Riggs
• 12:23   Indexam interface proposal Heikki Linnakangas
• 12:43   Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code? Mario Weilguni
• 13:00   Re: Indexam interface proposal Martijn van Oosterhout
• 13:04   Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures Gregory Stark
• 13:11   Re: Indexam interface proposal Heikki Linnakangas
• 13:17   Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures Stefan Kaltenbrunner
• 13:41   Re: Indexam interface proposal Teodor Sigaev
• 13:45   Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures Andrew Dunstan
• 13:56   Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures Tom Lane
• 13:56   Re: Indexam interface proposal Heikki Linnakangas
• 13:58   Re: Indexam interface proposal Martijn van Oosterhout
• 14:14   Re: Indexam interface proposal Tom Lane
• 14:15   Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures Gregory Stark
• 14:25   Re: modifying the tbale function Andrew Dunstan
• 14:28   Re: Indexam interface proposal Teodor Sigaev
• 14:28   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT (was Question: pg_classattributes and race conditions ?) Hannu Krosing
• 14:34   Back from vacation Bruce Momjian
• 14:36   Re: Indexam interface proposal Teodor Sigaev
• 14:49   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT (was Question:pg_classattributes and race conditions ?) Heikki Linnakangas
• 15:14   getTypeIOParam is wrong for domains over array types? Tom Lane
• 15:30   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT (was Question: pg_classattributes and race conditions ?) Merlin Moncure
• 15:36   Re: getTypeIOParam is wrong for domains over array types? Merlin Moncure
• 15:42   Re: getTypeIOParam is wrong for domains over array types? Tom Lane
• 16:11   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT (was Question:pg_classattributes and race conditions ?) Simon Riggs
• 16:27   Re: modifying the tbale function Richard Huxton
• 16:36   Re: modifying the tbale function Andrew Dunstan
• 16:49   Re: modifying the tbale function Tom Lane
• 16:50   Re: Grouped Index Tuples / Clustered Indexes Bruce Momjian
• 16:53   Re: Patch license update to developer's FAQ Bruce Momjian
• 17:14   Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures Tom Lane
• 17:15   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT (was Question: pg_classattributes and race conditions ?) Merlin Moncure
• 17:29   Re: modifying the tbale function Gregory Stark
• 17:32   Re: who gets paid for this Bruce Momjian
• 17:43   alter operator class Teodor Sigaev
• 17:53   Re: modifying the tbale function Florian G. Pflug
• 18:00   Re: alter operator class Tom Lane
• 18:18   Re: modifying the tbale function Andrew Dunstan
• 18:40   Re: CLUSTER and MVCC Bruce Momjian
• 18:44   Re: modifying the tbale function Islam Hegazy
• 18:51   Re: modifying the tbale function Joe Conway
• 19:16   Re: modifying the tbale function Andrew Dunstan
• 19:23   Re: modifying the tbale function Joe Conway
• 19:35   Re: modifying the tbale function Gregory Stark
• 21:25   Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures Andrew Dunstan
• 21:27   Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures Andrew Dunstan
• 22:17   Make TIMESTAMP + TIME in the source code Luis D. García
• 22:59   Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures Tom Lane
• 23:17   Re: modifying the tbale function Florian G. Pflug
• 23:27   Re: modifying the tbale function Florian G. Pflug

20 March 2007

• 00:34   Re: modifying the tbale function Tom Lane
• 00:49   Re: modifying the tbale function Tom Lane
• 00:51   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Changes pg_trigger and extend pg_rewrite in order to allow Tom Lane
• 00:56   Stats for multi-column indexes Jeff Davis
• 01:12   buildfarm not reporting xml flag correctly? Tom Lane
• 01:25   Re: Stats for multi-column indexes Tom Lane
• 01:28   Re: initdb fails - postgresql does not support leap seconds Eric
• 01:34   modifying the table function Islam Hegazy
• 01:35   Re: buildfarm not reporting xml flag correctly? Andrew Dunstan
• 01:56   Re: Stats for multi-column indexes Jeff Davis
• 02:14   Re: Stats for multi-column indexes Mark Kirkwood
• 02:15   Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures Andrew Dunstan
• 03:42   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Changes pg_trigger and extend pg_rewrite in order to allow Jan Wieck
• 04:10   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Bumping catversion due to changes to pg_trigger and pg_rewrite. Tom Lane
• 06:57   Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures Tom Lane
• 09:07   Re: Stats for multi-column indexes Simon Riggs
• 09:44   Re: Stats for multi-column indexes Richard Huxton
• 10:23   Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures Martijn van Oosterhout
• 11:23   Stats processor not restarting Magnus Hagander
• 12:42   Re: Stats for multi-column indexes Alvaro Herrera
• 12:48   Re: Stats processor not restarting Alvaro Herrera
• 13:24   Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures Andrew Dunstan
• 13:30   Re: how to add seconds to a TimestampTz Alvaro Herrera
• 13:35   Re: modifying the tbale function Andrew Dunstan
• 13:41   Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures Stefan Kaltenbrunner
• 13:55   Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures Andrew Dunstan
• 14:06   Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures Alvaro Herrera
• 14:09   Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures Andrew Dunstan
• 14:37   Re: Stats for multi-column indexes Peter Eisentraut
• 14:41   Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures Tom Lane
• 14:50   Re: Stats processor not restarting Magnus Hagander
• 15:23   Re: Stats processor not restarting Tom Lane
• 15:29   Re: Stats for multi-column indexes Tom Lane
• 15:36   Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures Andrew Dunstan
• 15:51   Re: Stats processor not restarting Tom Lane
• 15:58   Re: modifying the tbale function Hannu Krosing
• 15:59   Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures Tom Lane
• 16:05   Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures Arturo Perez
• 16:19   Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures Andrew Dunstan
• 16:35   Question about tuplestore clients Gregory Stark
• 16:38   Patch for pg_dump Dany DeBontridder
• 17:08   Reminder: only 5 days left to submit SoC applications Josh Berkus
• 17:11   Effects of GUC settings on automatic replans Tom Lane
• 17:13   Re: Stats for multi-column indexes Josh Berkus
• 17:19   Re: Stats for multi-column indexes Jeff Davis
• 17:21   Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures Martijn van Oosterhout
• 17:24   Re: Question about tuplestore clients Tom Lane
• 17:25   Re: Patch for pg_dump Tom Lane
• 17:38   Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures Tom Lane
• 17:47   Re: Stats for multi-column indexes Jeff Davis
• 17:49   Re: Stats for multi-column indexes Tom Lane
• 17:59   SoC Ideas for people looking for projects Benjamin Arai
• 18:07   Re: Interaction of PITR backups and Bulkoperationsavoiding WAL Jim C. Nasby
• 18:23   Money type todos? Joshua D. Drake
• 18:24   Re: Interaction of PITR backups and Bulkoperationsavoiding WAL Tom Lane
• 18:38   Re: Indexam interface proposal Heikki Linnakangas
• 18:44   Bitmapscan changes - Requesting further feedback Joshua D. Drake
• 18:46   Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures Andrew Dunstan
• 18:59   Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures Joshua D. Drake
• 19:06   Re: Stats for multi-column indexes Jim C. Nasby
• 19:16   Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures Andrew Dunstan
• 19:19   Re: Stats for multi-column indexes Tom Lane
• 19:26   Re: Money type todos? Tom Lane
• 19:52   Fixing hash index build time Tom Lane
• 20:05   Re: Money type todos? D'Arcy J.M. Cain
• 20:36   Re: Money type todos? Neil Conway
• 21:06   Re: modifying the tbale function Florian G. Pflug
• 22:11   Question about the TODO, numerics, and division Chris Travers
• 22:37   Re: Bitmapscan changes - Requesting further feedback Gavin Sherry
• 23:01   Re: Make TIMESTAMP + TIME in the source code Martijn van Oosterhout
• 23:02   Re: Bitmapscan changes - Requesting further feedback Joshua D. Drake

21 March 2007

• 00:03   Re: Fixing hash index build time Tom Lane
• 00:27   Re: Question about the TODO, numerics, and division Tom Lane
• 00:38   Re: Patch for pg_dump Bruce Momjian
• 01:29   Caught up on email Bruce Momjian
• 02:26   GSoC's possible project Germán Poó Caamaño
• 02:37   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Bruce Momjian
• 04:34   Re: Money type todos? Dennis Bjorklund
• 05:57   HOT WIP Patch - Version 5.0 Pavan Deolasee
• 06:31   Re: Money type todos? Tom Lane
• 08:47   Re: Effects of GUC settings on automatic replans Josh Berkus
• 09:05   Re: Money type todos? db@zigo.dhs.org
• 09:13   Re: Patch for pg_dump Dany DeBontridder
• 09:13   Re: Money type todos? August Zajonc
• 09:28   Re: Stats for multi-column indexes Csaba Nagy
• 09:47   Re: Stats for multi-column indexes Csaba Nagy
• 10:18   Re: Bitmapscan changes - Requesting further feedback Heikki Linnakangas
• 12:21   Re: Question: pg_class attributes and race conditions ? Gregory Stark
• 12:27   Re: Question about the TODO, numerics, and division Martijn van Oosterhout
• 12:58   Re: Question about the TODO, numerics, and division Gregory Stark
• 13:08   Re: GSoC's possible project Alvaro Herrera
• 13:16   Re: Money type todos? Andrew Dunstan
• 13:50   Re: Money type todos? D'Arcy J.M. Cain
• 14:07   Re: Money type todos? D'Arcy J.M. Cain
• 14:48   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Bruce Momjian
• 14:56   Re: Effects of GUC settings on automatic replans Tom Lane
• 15:01   Remove add_missing_from_clause? Joshua D. Drake
• 15:14   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Heikki Linnakangas
• 15:16   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Native shared memory implementation for win32. Tom Lane
• 15:18   Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes Grzegorz Jaskiewicz
• 15:22   Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes Joshua D. Drake
• 15:26   Re: [GENERAL] Remove add_missing_from_clause? Tom Lane
• 15:30   Re: [GENERAL] Remove add_missing_from_clause? Joshua D. Drake
• 15:35   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Simon Riggs
• 15:36   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Native shared memory implementation for win32. Magnus Hagander
• 15:43   Re: Money type todos? August Zajonc
• 15:48   Re: Money type todos? Shane Ambler
• 15:59   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Heikki Linnakangas
• 15:59   Re: HOT WIP Patch - Version 5.0 Simon Riggs
• 16:01   Re: [GENERAL] Remove add_missing_from_clause? Tom Lane
• 16:06   Re: [GENERAL] Remove add_missing_from_clause? Joshua D. Drake
• 16:07   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Gregory Stark
• 16:11   Re: HOT WIP Patch - Version 5.0 Pavan Deolasee
• 16:23   Limiting user connnections on 7.4 Saqib Awan
• 16:23   Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes Heikki Linnakangas
• 16:23   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Bruce Momjian
• 16:28   Re: Money type todos? Brian Hurt
• 16:29   Re: Money type todos? August Zajonc
• 16:37   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Pavan Deolasee
• 16:38   SoC Ideas for people looking for projects Benjamin Arai
• 16:38   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Bruce Momjian
• 16:40   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Bruce Momjian
• 16:40   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Bruce Momjian
• 16:44   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Bruce Momjian
• 16:44   TOASTing smaller things Chris Browne
• 16:56   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Gregory Stark
• 17:00   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Pavan Deolasee
• 17:27   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Bruce Momjian
• 17:27   Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes Heikki Linnakangas
• 17:30   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Bruce Momjian
• 17:39   Re: Effects of GUC settings on automatic replans Jan Wieck
• 17:40   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Bruce Momjian
• 17:41   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Merlin Moncure
• 17:45   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Pavan Deolasee
• 17:46   Re: Effects of GUC settings on automatic replans Tom Lane
• 17:51   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Pavan Deolasee
• 18:01   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Florian G. Pflug
• 18:05   Re: TOASTing smaller things Tom Lane
• 18:07   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Merlin Moncure
• 18:11   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Bruce Momjian
• 18:24   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Bruce Momjian
• 18:26   Re: Effects of GUC settings on automatic replans Jan Wieck
• 18:36   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Bruce Momjian
• 18:44   Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes Grzegorz Jaskiewicz
• 18:47   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Simon Riggs
• 18:55   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Heikki Linnakangas
• 18:56   Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes Grzegorz Jaskiewicz
• 19:01   Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes Heikki Linnakangas
• 19:05   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Bruce Momjian
• 19:48   Re: TOASTing smaller things Jan Wieck
• 20:00   relation 71478240 deleted while still in use on 8.1 Grzegorz Jaskiewicz
• 20:12   Re: TOASTing smaller things Bruce Momjian
• 20:29   Re: TOASTing smaller things Chris Browne
• 20:40   Re: relation 71478240 deleted while still in use on 8.1 Heikki Linnakangas
• 21:21   Re: Question about the TODO, numerics, and division Bruce Momjian
• 21:25   Re: Fixing hash index build time Bruce Momjian
• 21:32   libpq cursor support? Andrew Dunstan
• 21:52   Subversion repo up Joshua D. Drake
• 21:56   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Bruce Momjian
• 22:02   Re: Patch for pg_dump Bruce Momjian
• 22:12   Re: Subversion repo up Joshua D. Drake
• 22:14   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Andrew Dunstan
• 22:23   Re: TOASTing smaller things Jim C. Nasby
• 22:25   Re: relation 71478240 deleted while still in use on 8.1 Tom Lane
• 22:26   Re: libpq cursor support? Martijn van Oosterhout
• 22:34   Re: libpq cursor support? Tom Lane
• 22:46   Re: Patch for pg_dump Tom Lane
• 23:15   fixing dllist? Alvaro Herrera
• 23:21   Re: Patch for pg_dump Andrew Dunstan
• 23:28   Re: relation 71478240 deleted while still in use on 8.1 Grzegorz Jaskiewicz
• 23:37   Re: fixing dllist? Tom Lane

22 March 2007

• 02:25   Re: [PATCHES] As proposed the complete changes to pg_trigger and pg_rewrite Bruce Momjian
• 04:05   Proposal: Adding JIS X 0213 support Tatsuo Ishii
• 04:50   Re: Proposal: Adding JIS X 0213 support Tom Lane
• 04:57   Re: Proposal: Adding JIS X 0213 support Tatsuo Ishii
• 04:58   Re: Proposal: Adding JIS X 0213 support Tatsuo Ishii
• 05:16   Re: Proposal: Adding JIS X 0213 support Tom Lane
• 05:22   Re: Proposal: Adding JIS X 0213 support Tatsuo Ishii
• 05:41   LIKE optimization in UTF-8 and locale-C ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 06:25   Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes Pavan Deolasee
• 07:11   Re: relation 71478240 deleted while still in use on 8.1 Grzegorz Jaskiewicz
• 07:15   Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes Grzegorz Jaskiewicz
• 09:06   Re: Fixing hash index build time Hannu Krosing
• 09:19   Re: Patch for pg_dump Dany DeBontridder
• 09:23   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Csaba Nagy
• 09:43   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Pavan Deolasee
• 10:22   Function cache regeneration Hubert FONGARNAND
• 11:10   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Andrew Dunstan
• 11:59   Google SoC idea: FTS support in GUI tools Ivan Zolotukhin
• 13:24   Re: [PATCHES] As proposed the complete changes to pg_trigger and pg_rewrite Jan Wieck
• 13:25   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Merlin Moncure
• 14:09   Re: fixing dllist? Alvaro Herrera
• 14:11   Re: Function cache regeneration Merlin Moncure
• 14:22   Re: Fixing hash index build time Bruce Momjian
• 14:41   Re: Fixing hash index build time Tom Lane
• 14:54   Re: fixing dllist? Tom Lane
• 14:59   Re: Function cache regeneration Tom Lane
• 15:08   Re: LIKE optimization in UTF-8 and locale-C Tom Lane
• 15:10   Re: TOASTing smaller things Luke Lonergan
• 15:38   Hi, i want to contribute... andress calderon
• 15:39   Re: Hi, i want to contribute... Bruce Momjian
• 15:56   Re: Hi, i want to contribute... Joshua D. Drake
• 16:15   Regression failure in PL/Tcl Alvaro Herrera
• 16:31   Re: Regression failure in PL/Tcl Alvaro Herrera
• 16:41   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Pavan Deolasee
• 16:42   Re: TOASTing smaller things Andreas Pflug
• 16:56   Re: Regression failure in PL/Tcl Tom Lane
• 16:59   Re: Regression failure in PL/Tcl Andrew Dunstan
• 17:08   Re: Regression failure in PL/Tcl Alvaro Herrera
• 17:19   Re: TOASTing smaller things Luke Lonergan
• 17:41   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Tom Lane
• 17:50   Re: [GENERAL] Bug in CREATE/DROP TABLESPACE command Tom Lane
• 18:00   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Pavan Deolasee
• 18:13   Re: [BUGS] "Relation not found" error but table exits. Tom Lane
• 18:22   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT (was Question: pg_classattributes and race conditions ?) Jim C. Nasby
• 18:26   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Bruce Momjian
• 19:48   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Simon Riggs
• 20:04   Re: TOASTing smaller things Chris Browne
• 20:11   Re: LIKE optimization in UTF-8 and locale-C Hannu Krosing
• 20:16   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Tom Lane
• 20:16   Re: [PATCHES] xml2 contrib patch supporting default XML namespaces Bruce Momjian
• 20:26   Re: [PATCHES] xpath_array with namespaces support Bruce Momjian
• 20:34   Re: [PATCHES] As proposed the complete changes to pg_trigger and pg_rewrite Bruce Momjian
• 20:39   Re: [RFC] CLUSTER VERBOSE Bruce Momjian
• 20:55   Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code? Bruce Momjian
• 20:55   Re: [PATCHES] xpath_array with namespaces support Peter Eisentraut
• 21:01   Re: [PATCHES] xml2 contrib patch supporting default XML namespaces Peter Eisentraut
• 21:08   Re: [PATCHES] xml2 contrib patch supporting default XML namespaces Bruce Momjian
• 21:15   Re: [PATCHES] xml2 contrib patch supporting default XML namespaces Dave Page
• 21:18   Re: [PATCHES] xml2 contrib patch supporting default XML namespaces Bruce Momjian
• 21:26   Re: [PATCHES] xml2 contrib patch supporting default XML namespaces Tom Lane
• 21:32   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Simon Riggs
• 21:34   Re: [PATCHES] xml2 contrib patch supporting default XML namespaces Mike Rylander
• 21:47   Re: [PATCHES] xml2 contrib patch supporting default XML namespaces Andrew Dunstan
• 21:56   Re: TOASTing smaller things Luke Lonergan
• 21:58   Re: CLUSTER and MVCC Bruce Momjian
• 22:02   Re: Hi, i want to contribute... Jeff Davis
• 22:03   Re: [PATCHES] xml2 contrib patch supporting default XML namespaces Peter Eisentraut
• 22:15   Re: CLUSTER and MVCC Tom Lane
• 22:21   Re: CLUSTER and MVCC Bruce Momjian
• 22:24   Re: TOASTing smaller things Hannu Krosing
• 22:29   Re: CLUSTER and MVCC Tom Lane
• 23:28   Re: TOASTing smaller things Luke Lonergan

23 March 2007

• 00:07   Re: [PATCHES] xml2 contrib patch supporting default XML namespaces Joshua D. Drake
• 02:22   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Russell Smith
• 02:22   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT (was Question: pg_classattributes and race conditions ?) Russell Smith
• 03:25   Re: LIKE optimization in UTF-8 and locale-C ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 03:58   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Pavan Deolasee
• 05:45   Re: LIKE optimization in UTF-8 and locale-C ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 05:53   Re: LIKE optimization in UTF-8 and locale-C Dennis Bjorklund
• 06:00   Re: LIKE optimization in UTF-8 and locale-C Andrew - Supernews
• 06:10   Re: LIKE optimization in UTF-8 and locale-C Andrew - Supernews
• 07:55   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Hannu Krosing
• 08:32   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Hannu Krosing
• 08:40   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Hannu Krosing
• 10:19   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Pavan Deolasee
• 11:58   tsearch_core for inclusion Teodor Sigaev
• 12:44   Re: tsearch_core for inclusion Florian G. Pflug
• 12:44   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Florian G. Pflug
• 12:51   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Pavan Deolasee
• 12:57   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Florian G. Pflug
• 13:44   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Bruce Momjian
• 13:46   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Bruce Momjian
• 13:51   Crash bug in 8.2.3 on Solaris 10/Sparc Zoltan Boszormenyi
• 14:15   Documentation access problems. Hugh Sasse
• 14:31   Re: Documentation access problems. Alvaro Herrera
• 14:41   Re: Crash bug in 8.2.3 on Solaris 10/Sparc Zdenek Kotala
• 15:13   Re: Documentation access problems. Tom Lane
• 15:29   Re: Documentation access problems. Andrew Dunstan
• 15:39   Re: Documentation access problems. Joshua D. Drake
• 16:03   Re: Documentation access problems. Tom Lane
• 16:06   Re: Crash bug in 8.2.3 on Solaris 10/Sparc Tom Lane
• 16:22   Re: Documentation access problems. Joshua D. Drake
• 16:39   Re: Crash bug in 8.2.3 on Solaris 10/Sparc Zoltan Boszormenyi
• 16:41   Re: Documentation access problems. Peter Eisentraut
• 16:43   Re: Crash bug in 8.2.3 on Solaris 10/Sparc Zoltan Boszormenyi
• 16:51   Re: Documentation access problems. Joshua D. Drake
• 16:55   Re: Documentation access problems. Hugh Sasse
• 16:58   Re: Documentation access problems. Joshua D. Drake
• 17:15   Re: Documentation access problems. Hugh Sasse
• 17:24   EXISTS optimization Kevin Grittner
• 17:34   Re: Documentation access problems. Alvaro Herrera
• 17:34   Re: Documentation access problems. Hugh Sasse
• 17:50   Re: Documentation access problems. Hugh Sasse
• 17:53   Re: Documentation access problems. Andrew Dunstan
• 18:07   Re: Documentation access problems. Joshua D. Drake
• 18:07   Re: Documentation access problems. Hugh Sasse
• 18:18   Re: Documentation access problems. Hugh Sasse
• 18:20   Re: Documentation access problems. Joshua D. Drake
• 18:48   Re: Documentation access problems. Matthew T. O'Connor
• 18:59   Re: Documentation access problems. Bruce Momjian
• 19:31   Re: Documentation access problems. Tom Lane
• 19:34   Re: Documentation access problems. Bruce Momjian
• 19:57   Re: Documentation access problems. Matthew T. O'Connor
• 21:22   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: We no longer need to palloc the VacuumStmt node; keeping it on Tom Lane
• 21:49   Re: EXISTS optimization Tom Lane
• 21:57   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: We no longer need to palloc the VacuumStmt node; keeping it on Alvaro Herrera
• 22:26   Re: EXISTS optimization Kevin Grittner
• 22:27   Re: EXISTS optimization Martijn van Oosterhout
• 22:30   Re: EXISTS optimization Kevin Grittner
• 22:37   Re: [PERFORM] EXISTS optimization Kevin Grittner
• 23:04   Re: EXISTS optimization Tom Lane

24 March 2007

• 00:54   Time to package 8.2.4 Joshua D. Drake
• 02:28   Re: [PERFORM] EXISTS optimization Kevin Grittner
• 12:20   Re: Time to package 8.2.4 Grzegorz Jaskiewicz
• 13:06   Re: Time to package 8.2.4 nc-kocamana2
• 13:08   Re: EXISTS optimization Martijn van Oosterhout
• 14:07   tsearch2 regression test failures Magnus Hagander
• 18:00   Idea for cleaner representation of snapshots Tom Lane
• 20:22   Re: Idea for cleaner representation of snapshots Martijn van Oosterhout
• 21:15   Re: Idea for cleaner representation of snapshots Tom Lane
• 22:57   Vacation Jim Nasby
• 22:57   Re: Effects of GUC settings on automatic replans Jim Nasby
• 23:12   Re: Grouped Index Tuples / Clustered Indexes Bruce Momjian

25 March 2007

• 00:02   Re: Documentation access problems. Gregory Stark
• 00:03   Re: Idea for cleaner representation of snapshots Gregory Stark
• 00:03   datestyle GUC broken in HEAD? stark
• 00:07   Re: Effects of GUC settings on automatic replans Gregory Stark
• 01:20   Copyrights on files Bruce Momjian
• 01:39   BSD advertizing clause in some files Bruce Momjian
• 01:51   Re: [GENERAL] Fun with Cursors- how to rewind a cursor Bruce Momjian
• 01:58   Re: BSD advertizing clause in some files Neil Conway
• 03:28   Re: Copyrights on files Alvaro Herrera
• 03:46   Re: BSD advertizing clause in some files Joshua D. Drake
• 03:47   Re: Copyrights on files Joshua D. Drake
• 03:47   Re: Copyrights on files Joshua D. Drake
• 11:10   Re: Idea for cleaner representation of snapshots Martijn van Oosterhout
• 12:31   Re: Idea for cleaner representation of snapshots Gregory Stark
• 12:32   Re: Proposal: Adding JIS X 0213 support Tatsuo Ishii
• 15:46   Re: Copyrights on files mark@mark.mielke.cc
• 17:23   Re: Idea for cleaner representation of snapshots Tom Lane
• 17:31   Re: Effects of GUC settings on automatic replans Tom Lane
• 18:08   Re: BSD advertizing clause in some files Tom Lane
• 18:18   Re: LIKE optimization in UTF-8 and locale-C Hannu Krosing
• 18:20   Re: datestyle GUC broken in HEAD? Tom Lane
• 19:04   Re: [GENERAL] Fun with Cursors- how to rewind a cursor Tom Lane
• 19:04   Re: Idea for cleaner representation of snapshots Gregory Stark
• 19:09   Re: Idea for cleaner representation of snapshots Tom Lane
• 19:12   Re: datestyle GUC broken in HEAD? Gregory Stark
• 20:07   Re: Idea for cleaner representation of snapshots Tom Lane
• 23:08   Re: [GENERAL] Fun with Cursors- how to rewind a cursor Tom Lane

26 March 2007

• 00:44   Re: tsearch2 regression test failures Tom Lane
• 01:32   Re: Arrays of Complex Types David Fetter
• 01:39   Server-side support of all encodings ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 02:18   Re: Arrays of Complex Types Tom Lane
• 02:20   Re: Server-side support of all encodings Tom Lane
• 02:29   Re: Server-side support of all encodings ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 02:49   Re: Server-side support of all encodings Tom Lane
• 03:31   Re: Server-side support of all encodings Ioseph Kim
• 07:02   Changing semantics of autovacuum_cost_limit Galy Lee
• 09:31   Re: Crash bug in 8.2.3 on Solaris 10/Sparc Zoltan Boszormenyi
• 09:38   Re: Crash bug in 8.2.3 on Solaris 10/Sparc Zoltan Boszormenyi
• 09:41   Re: Server-side support of all encodings Tatsuo Ishii
• 10:32   Re: tsearch2 regression test failures Teodor Sigaev
• 10:34   Re: Server-side support of all encodings Tatsuo Ishii
• 10:39   Group Commit Heikki Linnakangas
• 10:58   Re: tsearch2 regression test failures Magnus Hagander
• 11:10   Re: tsearch2 regression test failures Teodor Sigaev
• 11:16   Re: tsearch2 regression test failures Magnus Hagander
• 11:53   Proposal: integration plpgpsm into core PostgreSQL Pavel Stehule
• 13:18   Re: tsearch2 regression test failures Tom Lane
• 13:35   Re: tsearch2 regression test failures Andrew Dunstan
• 13:52   Re: Server-side support of all encodings Tom Lane
• 14:04   Guarenteeing complex referencial integrity through custom triggers Joris Dobbelsteen
• 14:32   Re: tsearch_core for inclusion Oleg Bartunov
• 14:47   Re: Copyrights on files Florian Weimer
• 15:30   notification payloads Andrew Dunstan
• 15:57   Re: tsearch_core for inclusion Florian G. Pflug
• 16:06   Re: notification payloads Dave Page
• 16:07   Re: tsearch_core for inclusion Oleg Bartunov
• 16:08   Re: Time to package 8.2.4 Joshua D. Drake
• 16:31   Re: notification payloads Andrew Dunstan
• 16:44   Re: notification payloads Alvaro Herrera
• 16:53   Partitioned tables constraint_exclusion Weslee Bilodeau
• 16:59   Re: notification payloads Andrew Dunstan
• 17:11   Re: Time to package 8.2.4 Peter Eisentraut
• 17:18   Re: Time to package 8.2.4 Joshua D. Drake
• 17:27   pg_index updates and SI invalidation Pavan Deolasee
• 17:46   Re: pg_index updates and SI invalidation Tom Lane
• 17:52   Re: Guarenteeing complex referencial integrity through custom triggers Tom Lane
• 17:55   Re: tsearch_core for inclusion Tom Lane
• 18:01   Re: pg_index updates and SI invalidation Pavan Deolasee
• 18:08   Re: notification payloads Tom Lane
• 18:15   Re: pg_index updates and SI invalidation Tom Lane
• 18:23   Re: GSoC's possible project Robert Treat
• 18:36   Re: Guarenteeing complex referencial integrity through custom triggers Greg Sabino Mullane
• 18:38   Re: Time to package 8.2.4 Peter Eisentraut
• 18:41   Re: notification payloads Dave Page
• 18:56   Re: Time to package 8.2.4 Dave Page
• 19:03   Re: Partitioned tables constraint_exclusion Simon Riggs
• 19:05   Re: Time to package 8.2.4 Joshua D. Drake
• 19:10   Re: tsearch_core for inclusion Oleg Bartunov
• 19:12   Re: Time to package 8.2.4 Magnus Hagander
• 19:30   Re: Time to package 8.2.4 Dave Page
• 19:58   Re: Partitioned tables constraint_exclusion Weslee Bilodeau
• 20:17   Re: Time to package 8.2.4 Joshua D. Drake
• 20:41   Re: Guarenteeing complex referencial integrity through custom triggers Joris Dobbelsteen
• 20:46   Re: Guarenteeing complex referencial integrity through custom triggers Joris Dobbelsteen
• 20:49   Re: Partitioned tables constraint_exclusion Weslee Bilodeau
• 21:47   Re: BSD advertizing clause in some files Bruce Momjian
• 21:50   Re: Copyright question Bruce Momjian
• 22:31   Re: Time to package 8.2.4 Guillaume Smet
• 23:06   Re: notification payloads Gregory Stark
• 23:31   Re: Copyright question Neil Conway
• 23:39   Re: Copyrights on files Bruce Momjian
• 23:40   Re: Copyright question Bruce Momjian

27 March 2007

• 00:37   Re: Patch for pg_dump Bruce Momjian
• 00:40   Re: TOASTing smaller things Bruce Momjian
• 01:05   Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Bruce Momjian
• 01:37   Re: Proposal: Adding JIS X 0213 support Josh Berkus
• 01:46   Re: SCMS question Bruce Momjian
• 01:50   Re: timestamp subtraction (was Re: [SQL] formatting intervals with to_char) Bruce Momjian
• 01:53   Re: Proposal: Adding JIS X 0213 support Tatsuo Ishii
• 01:54   Re: Proposal: Adding JIS X 0213 support Tatsuo Ishii
• 01:55   Re: --enable-xml instead of --with-libxml? Bruce Momjian
• 02:36   Re: Proposal: Adding JIS X 0213 support Tom Lane
• 02:47   Re: Proposal: Adding JIS X 0213 support Tatsuo Ishii
• 03:02   Re: Proposal: Adding JIS X 0213 support Hiroshi Saito
• 03:10   Re: tsearch_core for inclusion Florian G. Pflug
• 03:19   Re: [PERFORM] EXISTS optimization Peter Kovacs
• 03:19   Full page writes improvement, code update Koichi Suzuki
• 03:34   Re: [BUGS] "Relation not found" error but table exits. Greg Sabino Mullane
• 04:22   Re: notification payloads Tom Lane
• 06:23   Re: notification payloads Hannu Krosing
• 07:57   Re: BSD advertizing clause in some files Marko Kreen
• 07:58   Re: pg_index updates and SI invalidation Pavan Deolasee
• 08:19   Re: notification payloads Hannu Krosing
• 08:39   Re: notification payloads Hannu Krosing
• 10:44   sorted results on pgbuildfarm Simon Riggs
• 11:06   Re: notification payloads Andrew Dunstan
• 11:11   Re: notification payloads Andrew Dunstan
• 11:16   Re: notification payloads Andrew Dunstan
• 11:18   Re: Re: [PATCHES] As proposed the complete changes to pg_trigger and pg_rewrite alfranio correia junior
• 11:29   Re: notification payloads Andrew Dunstan
• 11:33   Re: sorted results on pgbuildfarm Andrew Dunstan
• 11:44   Re: sorted results on pgbuildfarm Michael Fuhr
• 11:49   Re: sorted results on pgbuildfarm Simon Riggs
• 13:10   Re: notification payloads Andrew Dunstan
• 13:13   Re: notification payloads Hannu Krosing
• 13:19   Re: notification payloads Hannu Krosing
• 13:39   Re: Concurrent connections in psql Gregory Stark
• 13:45   Re: Guarenteeing complex referencial integrity through custom triggers Hannu Krosing
• 13:55   Re: notification payloads Tom Lane
• 14:33   Re: [BUGS] Partial index on varchar fields with IN Tom Lane
• 14:33   Re: Concurrent connections in psql Bruce Momjian
• 15:00   Re: sorted results on pgbuildfarm Tom Lane
• 15:30   Re: Group Commit Richard Huxton
• 15:41   Re: sorted results on pgbuildfarm Andrew Dunstan
• 15:52   Re: sorted results on pgbuildfarm David Fetter
• 15:57   Re: Log levels for checkpoint/bgwriter monitoring Bruce Momjian
• 16:00   Re: Copyright question David Fetter
• 16:08   Re: Copyright question Joshua D. Drake
• 16:17   Re: Copyright question Andrew Dunstan
• 17:07   Re: Copyright question Tom Lane
• 17:09   Re: Acclerating INSERT/UPDATE using UPS Bruce Momjian
• 17:16   Re: Concurrent connections in psql Heikki Linnakangas
• 17:22   Re: Archive log compression keeping physical log available in the crash recovery Bruce Momjian
• 17:30   Re: Log levels for checkpoint/bgwriter monitoring Magnus Hagander
• 17:40   Re: Log levels for checkpoint/bgwriter monitoring Bruce Momjian
• 18:09   Re: Arrays of Complex Types David Fetter
• 18:12   Re: Concurrent connections in psql Sailesh Krishnamurthy
• 19:04   Reduction in WAL for UPDATEs Simon Riggs
• 19:14   Re: sorted results on pgbuildfarm Simon Riggs
• 19:39   Re: Arrays of Complex Types David Fetter
• 19:50   Re: Guarenteeing complex referencial integrity throughcustom triggers Joris Dobbelsteen
• 20:00   Re: Concurrent connections in psql Simon Riggs
• 20:27   Re: [GENERAL] Priorities for users or queries? Simon Riggs
• 21:05   Re: Arrays of Complex Types Andrew Dunstan
• 21:11   Re: Full page writes improvement, code update Simon Riggs
• 21:11   Re: Concurrent connections in psql Andrew Dunstan
• 21:17   Re: Concurrent connections in psql Simon Riggs
• 21:25   Re: Concurrent connections in psql Andrew Dunstan
• 22:47   Re: Proposal: Adding JIS X 0213 support Josh Berkus
• 23:26   Warning on contrib/tsearch2 Neil Conway

28 March 2007

• 00:21   Re: Proposal: Adding JIS X 0213 support Hiroshi Saito
• 00:46   Re: Guarenteeing complex referencial integrity through custom triggers Greg Sabino Mullane
• 00:48   Re: Reduction in WAL for UPDATEs Tom Lane
• 00:54   Re: Concurrent connections in psql Tom Lane
• 01:15   Patch queue concern Bruce Momjian
• 01:24   Re: pg_index updates and SI invalidation Tom Lane
• 01:34   Re: Warning on contrib/tsearch2 Tom Lane
• 01:53   Re: [PATCHES] Full page writes improvement, code update Koichi Suzuki
• 02:15   Re: Warning on contrib/tsearch2 Andrew Dunstan
• 02:48   Re: pg_index updates and SI invalidation Pavan Deolasee
• 02:56   Re: Patch queue concern Josh Berkus
• 03:08   Re: Warning on contrib/tsearch2 Tom Lane
• 03:13   Re: pg_index updates and SI invalidation Tom Lane
• 05:47   Re: O_DIRECT support for Windows ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 07:05   Re: Arrays of Complex Types Andrew - Supernews
• 07:11   Re: Reduction in WAL for UPDATEs Simon Riggs
• 08:36   Re: O_DIRECT support for Windows Magnus Hagander
• 09:11   Re: [PATCHES] Full page writes improvement, code update Simon Riggs
• 10:04   Re: Concurrent connections in psql Heikki Linnakangas
• 10:14   Re: Patch queue concern Pavel Stehule
• 10:42   Re: Patch queue concern Bruce Momjian
• 10:53   Re: Patch queue concern Gregory Stark
• 12:54   Re: Reduction in WAL for UPDATEs Kenneth Marshall
• 13:33   Re: Log levels for checkpoint/bgwriter monitoring Greg Smith
• 13:46   Re: Reduction in WAL for UPDATEs Tom Lane
• 13:51   Re: Reduction in WAL for UPDATEs Florian G. Pflug
• 14:51   Re: Reduction in WAL for UPDATEs Tom Lane
• 14:56   ECPG threads test Magnus Hagander
• 14:59   Re: Reduction in WAL for UPDATEs Simon Riggs
• 15:06   Re: Reduction in WAL for UPDATEs Gregory Stark
• 15:14   Re: Reduction in WAL for UPDATEs Joshua D. Drake
• 15:17   Re: Reduction in WAL for UPDATEs Tom Lane
• 15:37   Re: Reduction in WAL for UPDATEs Simon Riggs
• 15:37   Re: Reduction in WAL for UPDATEs August Zajonc
• 15:44   Re: Reduction in WAL for UPDATEs Gregory Stark
• 16:05   Re: Reduction in WAL for UPDATEs Tom Lane
• 16:13   ECPG regression tests expected files Magnus Hagander
• 16:20   Re: Reduction in WAL for UPDATEs Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD
• 16:40   Re: Reduction in WAL for UPDATEs Tom Lane
• 16:40   Re: Patch queue concern Simon Riggs
• 16:54   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Pavan Deolasee
• 16:57   Re: Arrays of Complex Types David Fetter
• 17:11   Re: Arrays of Complex Types Alvaro Herrera
• 17:14   Modifying TOAST thresholds Tom Lane
• 17:16   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Simon Riggs
• 17:27   Re: ECPG regression tests expected files Michael Meskes
• 17:30   Re: ECPG regression tests expected files Magnus Hagander
• 17:32   Re: Reduction in WAL for UPDATEs Simon Riggs
• 17:34   Re: Arrays of Complex Types Andrew Dunstan
• 17:36   Re: Arrays of Complex Types Tom Lane
• 17:38   Re: Modifying TOAST thresholds Gregory Stark
• 17:52   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Florian G. Pflug
• 18:08   Re: Modifying TOAST thresholds Tom Lane
• 18:11   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Tom Lane
• 18:12   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Pavan Deolasee
• 18:36   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Pavan Deolasee
• 18:43   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Florian G. Pflug
• 18:49   Re: Arrays of Complex Types David Fetter
• 18:52   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Simon Riggs
• 19:13   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Florian G. Pflug
• 19:15   Re: Arrays of Complex Types Gregory Stark
• 19:24   Re: Arrays of Complex Types Tom Lane
• 19:40   Re: Patch queue concern Bruce Momjian
• 19:41   Re: Arrays of Complex Types David Fetter
• 19:48   Re: Patch queue concern Bruce Momjian
• 19:49   Re: Patch queue concern Joshua D. Drake
• 19:56   Re: Patch queue concern Bruce Momjian
• 20:03   Re: Patch queue concern Simon Riggs
• 20:48   Re: Patch queue concern Gregory Stark
• 20:51   Re: ECPG threads test Bruce Momjian
• 20:53   Re: ECPG threads test Magnus Hagander
• 21:02   Re: Patch queue concern Bruce Momjian
• 21:04   Re: ECPG threads test Bruce Momjian
• 21:08   Re: Patch queue concern Simon Riggs
• 21:13   Re: Patch queue concern Bruce Momjian
• 21:18   Re: Patch queue concern Joshua D. Drake
• 21:37   Re: Patch queue concern Bruce Momjian
• 21:44   Re: Patch queue concern Joshua D. Drake
• 21:44   Re: Patch queue concern Simon Riggs
• 22:19   Re: Patch queue concern Jeremy Drake
• 23:21   Re: Guarenteeing complex referencial integrity through custom triggers Joris Dobbelsteen
• 23:34   Re: Patch queue concern Simon Riggs

29 March 2007

• 00:54   problems with plan invalidation Kris Jurka
• 01:13   Re: Patch queue concern Gregory Stark
• 02:11   Re: Patch queue concern Carlo Florendo
• 02:17   Re: Patch queue concern Carlo Florendo
• 03:30   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Pavan Deolasee
• 05:34   Re: Patch queue concern Tom Lane
• 08:49   Re: [PATCHES] Full page writes improvement, code update Koichi Suzuki
• 09:06   Re: Patch queue concern Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD
• 10:06   Re: Patch queue concern Simon Riggs
• 10:10   Re: [PATCHES] Full page writes improvement, code update Simon Riggs
• 10:15   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Florian G. Pflug
• 10:41   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Pavan Deolasee
• 10:52   Group Commit Heikki Linnakangas
• 11:29   Re: Group Commit Heikki Linnakangas
• 11:35   Re: Modifying TOAST thresholds Simon Riggs
• 11:37   Re: Patch queue concern Gregory Stark
• 11:45   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Florian G. Pflug
• 12:03   Re: ECPG threads test Michael Meskes
• 12:05   Re: ECPG regression tests expected files Michael Meskes
• 14:45   Re: Patch queue concern Andrew Dunstan
• 15:08   Re: Patch queue concern Tom Lane
• 15:34   Re: ECPG regression tests expected files Magnus Hagander
• 15:45   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Tom Lane
• 16:06   Re: Modifying TOAST thresholds Tom Lane
• 16:12   Re: Warning on contrib/tsearch2 Teodor Sigaev
• 16:21   tsearch_core patch for inclusion Teodor Sigaev
• 16:26   Re: Group Commit Tom Lane
• 16:38   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Pavan Deolasee
• 16:42   Re: Group Commit Heikki Linnakangas
• 16:42   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Gregory Stark
• 16:57   Re: Group Commit Tom Lane
• 17:23   CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY and HOT Pavan Deolasee
• 17:26   Re: Patch queue concern Bruce Momjian
• 17:31   Re: Fixing insecure security definer functions Tom Lane
• 17:32   Re: Patch queue concern Joshua D. Drake
• 17:34   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Pavan Deolasee
• 17:41   Re: Patch queue concern Bruce Momjian
• 17:48   Re: Patch queue concern August Zajonc
• 17:48   Re: Patch queue concern Bruce Momjian
• 17:55   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Bruce Momjian
• 18:03   Re: Fixing insecure security definer functions Merlin Moncure
• 18:11   Re: Fixing insecure security definer functions Stephen Frost
• 18:13   Re: tsearch_core patch for inclusion Bruce Momjian
• 18:14   Re: Patch queue concern Tom Lane
• 18:18   Re: Fixing insecure security definer functions Merlin Moncure
• 18:19   Re: Fixing insecure security definer functions Tom Lane
• 18:39   Re: Concurrent connections in psql Sailesh Krishnamurthy
• 18:40   Re: Server-side support of all encodings Dezso Zoltan
• 19:17   Re: [PATCHES] Full page writes improvement, code update Josh Berkus
• 19:33   Re: Server-side support of all encodings Martijn van Oosterhout
• 19:33   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Gregory Stark
• 19:35   Re: problems with plan invalidation Tom Lane
• 20:21   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Simon Riggs
• 20:26   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Simon Riggs
• 20:39   Feature thought: idle in transaction timeout Joshua D. Drake
• 20:46   Re: [PATCHES] Full page writes improvement, code update Simon Riggs
• 20:58   Re: Modifying TOAST thresholds Simon Riggs
• 21:16   Re: [JDBC] problems with plan invalidation Kris Jurka
• 21:23   timing in PostgreSQL Carlos Chacon
• 21:27   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Tom Lane
• 21:48   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Florian G. Pflug
• 21:59   List of uncompleted patches for 8.2 Bruce Momjian
• 22:01   Re: List of uncompleted patches for 8.2 Bruce Momjian
• 22:03   Re: List of uncompleted patches for 8.3 Bruce Momjian
• 22:05   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Simon Riggs
• 22:51   Is this an psql Error??? Carlos Chacon
• 22:54   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Florian G. Pflug

30 March 2007

• 00:59   Re: [PATCHES] Full page writes improvement, code update Koichi Suzuki
• 04:02   Re: [PATCHES] Full page writes improvement, code update Koichi Suzuki
• 04:15   Autovacuum vs statement_timeout Tom Lane
• 05:35   Re: Server-side support of all encodings Tatsuo Ishii
• 05:38   Re: Server-side support of all encodings Tatsuo Ishii
• 06:14   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Pavan Deolasee
• 07:16   Re: Crash bug in 8.2.3 on Solaris 10/Sparc Zdenek Kotala
• 08:22   Re: [PATCHES] Full page writes improvement, code update Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD
• 09:50   Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout Heikki Linnakangas
• 10:19   Re: [PATCHES] Full page writes improvement, code update Simon Riggs
• 10:23   Minor changes to Recovery related code Simon Riggs
• 10:33   Re: [PATCHES] Full page writes improvement, code update Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD
• 10:36   Proposal: include PL/Proxy into core Marko Kreen
• 10:36   Re: [PATCHES] Full page writes improvement, code update Richard Huxton
• 10:47   Re: Proposal: include PL/Proxy into core Cédric Villemain
• 11:06   Re: Proposal: include PL/Proxy into core Marko Kreen
• 11:25   Re: [PATCHES] Full page writes improvement, code update Simon Riggs
• 11:26   Re: UPDATE using sub selects NikhilS
• 11:48   Re: [PATCHES] Full page writes improvement, code update Richard Huxton
• 12:39   Re: Proposal: include PL/Proxy into core Hannu Krosing
• 13:01   Proposal: Adding CP51932 encoding Tatsuo Ishii
• 15:01   Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout Tom Lane
• 15:49   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Tom Lane
• 16:19   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Pavan Deolasee
• 16:32   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Florian G. Pflug
• 16:34   Re: [pgsql-www] Help: reading the source Andrew Hammond
• 16:43   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Tom Lane
• 16:44   Oracle indemnifies PostgreSQL on its patents Bruce Momjian
• 16:46   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Florian G. Pflug
• 16:50   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Pavan Deolasee
• 16:52   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Tom Lane
• 16:55   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Simon Riggs
• 16:59   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Pavan Deolasee
• 17:07   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Florian G. Pflug
• 17:14   Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout Tom Lane
• 17:20   Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout Alvaro Herrera
• 17:21   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Pavan Deolasee
• 17:39   Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout Tom Lane
• 17:50   Re: Proposal: include PL/Proxy into core Tom Lane
• 17:52   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Florian G. Pflug
• 17:54   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Tom Lane
• 18:39   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Simon Riggs
• 18:49   Re: Proposal: include PL/Proxy into core Josh Berkus
• 20:24   Re: Arrays of Complex Types David Fetter
• 20:34   Re: Minor changes to Recovery related code Tom Lane
• 20:36   Re: [PATCHES] Full page writes improvement, code update Tom Lane
• 20:46   Re: UPDATE using sub selects Tom Lane
• 20:48   Re: Oracle indemnifies PostgreSQL on its patents Josh Berkus
• 21:08   Re: Arrays of Complex Types Tom Lane
• 21:28   Re: [PATCHES] Full page writes improvement, code update Simon Riggs
• 21:39   Re: Minor changes to Recovery related code Simon Riggs
• 22:51   Re: Minor changes to Recovery related code Florian G. Pflug

31 March 2007

• 00:07   Last minute mini-proposal (I know, I know) for PQexecf() 
• 00:30   Re: Last minute mini-proposal (I know, I know) for PQexecf() Tom Lane
• 00:37   Re: [PATCHES] Full page writes improvement, code update Koichi Suzuki
• 00:46   Re: Last minute mini-proposal (I know, I know) for PQexecf() Gregory Stark
• 01:38   Re: Modifying TOAST thresholds Christopher Browne
• 03:45   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Pavan Deolasee
• 04:04   Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design Pavan Deolasee
• 05:15   Re: UPDATE using sub selects NikhilS
• 07:40   Re: Proposal: include PL/Proxy into core Marko Kreen
• 08:19   Re: Proposal: include PL/Proxy into core Marko Kreen
• 08:27   Re: Feature thought: idle in transaction timeout Russell Smith
• 12:16   CIC and deadlocks Pavan Deolasee
• 13:18   Re: CIC and deadlocks Simon Riggs
• 13:34   Re: Last minute mini-proposal (I know, I know) forPQexecf() 
• 15:38   Re: CIC and deadlocks Tom Lane
• 15:46   Re: Last minute mini-proposal (I know, I know) forPQexecf() Tom Lane
• 15:46   Re: Feature thought: idle in transaction timeout Joshua D. Drake
• 16:03   Re: Feature thought: idle in transaction timeout Tom Lane
• 16:11   Re: Feature thought: idle in transaction timeout Joshua D. Drake
• 16:14   Re: Feature thought: idle in transaction timeout Joshua D. Drake
• 16:22   Re: CIC and deadlocks Pavan Deolasee
• 17:06   Re: Oracle indemnifies PostgreSQL on its patents Luke Lonergan
• 17:20   Re: Oracle indemnifies PostgreSQL on its patents Andrew Dunstan
• 17:33   Re: CIC and deadlocks Tom Lane
• 17:46   Re: Oracle indemnifies PostgreSQL on its patents Joshua D. Drake
• 17:53   Re: Oracle indemnifies PostgreSQL on its patents Alvaro Herrera
• 18:01   Re: Oracle indemnifies PostgreSQL on its patents Joshua D. Drake
• 18:22   Re: CIC and deadlocks Pavan Deolasee
• 18:32   Re: Oracle indemnifies PostgreSQL on its patents Tom Lane
• 18:55   Re: Oracle indemnifies PostgreSQL on its patents Tom Lane
• 19:00   Re: CIC and deadlocks Tom Lane
• 20:09   Re: Oracle indemnifies PostgreSQL on its patents Luke Lonergan
• 22:14   Re: Last minute mini-proposal (I know, I know)forPQexecf() 
• 22:36   Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout Peter Eisentraut
• 23:10   Macros for typtype (was Re: Arrays of Complex Types) Tom Lane
• 23:12   Re: Last minute mini-proposal (I know, I know)forPQexecf() Bruce Momjian
• 23:13   Re: Last minute mini-proposal (I know, I know)forPQexecf() Andrew Dunstan
• 23:13   Re: Macros for typtype (was Re: Arrays of Complex Types) Bruce Momjian
• 23:16   Re: Last minute mini-proposal (I know, I know)forPQexecf() Bruce Momjian
• 23:30   Re: Last minute mini-proposal (I know, Iknow)forPQexecf() 
• 23:36   Re: Macros for typtype (was Re: Arrays of Complex Types) David Fetter
• 23:58   Re: Macros for typtype (was Re: Arrays of Complex Types) Tom Lane