Re: Bug in VACUUM FULL ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavan Deolasee
Subject Re: Bug in VACUUM FULL ?
Date
Msg-id 45F004ED.4060301@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bug in VACUUM FULL ?  ("Pavan Deolasee" <pavan.deolasee@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Bug in VACUUM FULL ?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Pavan Deolasee wrote:>> Thanks a lot, Tom. It seems to work fine for me. I will do some> more tests and report if I see
anyissue.>
 

The problem mentioned before is hard to reproduce with the
suggested change, but its not completely gone away. I have
seen that again on CVS HEAD with the patch applied.

I am facing another issue with VACUUM FULL. This
problem gets reproduced with HOT very easily, but takes
few attempts to reproduce with CVS HEAD, but it
certainly exists.

This time I am using pgbench. All tables but "history" are
created with fillfactor=50

Now, I start running pgbench with scale factor of 10 and 40
clients and 10000 txns/client. After few minutes, I start
running VACUUM FULL on tellers and branches, every 10 seconds.
After a while, all pgbench clients fail with the following
errors:


Client 1 aborted in state 11: ERROR:  duplicate key violates unique 
constraint "branches_pkey"
Client 30 aborted in state 11: ERROR:  duplicate key violates unique 
constraint "branches_pkey"
Client 39 aborted in state 11: ERROR:  duplicate key violates unique 
constraint "branches_pkey"
Client 7 aborted in state 11: ERROR:  duplicate key violates unique 
constraint "branches_pkey"

Next run of VACUUM FULL gives the following error:

WARNING:  index "branches_pkey" contains 15 row versions, but table 
contains 12 row versions
HINT:  Rebuild the index with REINDEX.


Has this been reported earlier ? IIRC Tom mentioned in one of the
emails that Merlin has reported some problem related
to "duplicate key violation". Tom, could this be related ?


Thanks,
Pavan

-- 


EnterpriseDB        http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: WSAStartup() in libpq
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: WSAStartup() in libpq