Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes
Date
Msg-id 46015BE2.7010001@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes  (Grzegorz Jaskiewicz <gj@pointblue.com.pl>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes  (Grzegorz Jaskiewicz <gj@pointblue.com.pl>)
List pgsql-hackers
Grzegorz Jaskiewicz wrote:
> 
> On Mar 19, 2007, at 11:16 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> 
>> Grzegorz Jaskiewicz wrote:
>>> On Mar 16, 2007, at 10:12 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>>>> You'll obviously need to run it with the patch applied. I'd suggest 
>>>> to enable stats_block_level to see the effect on buffer cache 
>>>> hit/miss ratio.
>>> groupeditems-42-pghead.patch.gz is enough, or it needs 
>>> maintain_cluster_order_v5.patch ??
>>
>> No, it won't make a difference unless you're inserting to the table, 
>> and the inserts are not in cluster order.
> well, that's okay than. I see really good improvement in terms of speed 
> and db size (which reflects obviously in i/o performance).
> Let me know if further testing can be done. I would happily see it in 
> mainline.

If you have a real-world database you could try it with, that would be 
nice. The test I sent you is pretty much a best-case scenario, it'd be 
interesting to get anecdotal evidence of improvements in real applications.

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Saqib Awan"
Date:
Subject: Limiting user connnections on 7.4
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design