Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Grzegorz Jaskiewicz
Subject Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes
Date
Msg-id 3BFE0985-5245-4268-8BFF-9A013C2E65FF@pointblue.com.pl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mar 19, 2007, at 11:16 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:

> Grzegorz Jaskiewicz wrote:
>> On Mar 16, 2007, at 10:12 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>>> You'll obviously need to run it with the patch applied. I'd  
>>> suggest to enable stats_block_level to see the effect on buffer  
>>> cache hit/miss ratio.
>> groupeditems-42-pghead.patch.gz is enough, or it needs  
>> maintain_cluster_order_v5.patch ??
>
> No, it won't make a difference unless you're inserting to the  
> table, and the inserts are not in cluster order.
well, that's okay than. I see really good improvement in terms of  
speed and db size (which reflects obviously in i/o performance).
Let me know if further testing can be done. I would happily see it in  
mainline.



-- 
Grzegorz Jaskiewicz

C/C++ freelance for hire







pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Native shared memory implementation for win32.
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes