Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant
Date
Msg-id 23504.1173133198@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant  (Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz>)
Responses Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant  (Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz> writes:
> Elapsed time is exactly the same (101 s). Is is expected that HEAD would 
> behave differently?

Offhand I don't think so.  But what I wanted to see was the curve of
elapsed time vs shared_buffers?
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mark Kirkwood
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant
Next
From: "Mike Rylander"
Date:
Subject: xml2 contrib patch supporting default XML namespaces