Re: HOT - whats next ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: HOT - whats next ?
Date
Msg-id 45EC535C.9020901@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: HOT - whats next ?  ("Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: HOT - whats next ?  ("Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs wrote:
>
> The main point is to get a set of functions that can be used directly in
> additional regression tests as well as diagnostics. ISTM we need to
> *prove* HOT works, not just claim it. I'm very open to different
> approaches as to how we might do this.
>
>   

Functions to support regression tests don't need to be built-ins. We 
already load some extra stuff for regression tests.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Luke Lonergan"
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant
Next
From: "Simon Riggs"
Date:
Subject: Re: HOT - whats next ?