Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant
Date
Msg-id 15267.1173709819@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant  (ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp> writes:
> I tested your patch with VACUUM FREEZE. The performance was improved when
> I set scan_recycle_buffers > 32. I used VACUUM FREEZE to increase WAL traffic,
> but this patch should be useful for normal VACUUMs with backgrond jobs!

Proving that you can see a different in a worst-case scenario is not the
same as proving that the patch is useful in normal cases.
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Simon Riggs"
Date:
Subject: Re: Synchronized Scan update
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: autovacuum next steps, take 3