Re: 8.1.x (tested 8.1.8) timezone bugs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: 8.1.x (tested 8.1.8) timezone bugs
Date
Msg-id 45F6F73A.7050203@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 8.1.x (tested 8.1.8) timezone bugs  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: 8.1.x (tested 8.1.8) timezone bugs  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
>> Does this not seem a problem to you?
> 
> No.  8.2 is case-insensitive on timezone names, but prior releases were not.
> I believe the difference you're seeing in 8.1 is that 'PST8PDT' binds to
> the zic database entry by that name, while 'pst8pdt' falls back on the
> POSIX-default rules, which are presumably still the old DST law.

Well in my test case, I explicitly note that PST8PDT != 'PST8PDT' .

That is my actual concern. Before DST it wasn't an issue, now it is. Is
that PostgreSQL's problem? Probably not, but it certainly seems
inconsistent.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


> 
>             regards, tom lane
> 


-- 
     === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997            http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.1.x (tested 8.1.8) timezone bugs
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.1.x (tested 8.1.8) timezone bugs