Re: what can be wrong? backport plpgpsm to 8.1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: what can be wrong? backport plpgpsm to 8.1
Date
Msg-id 17096.1173548218@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to what can be wrong? backport plpgpsm to 8.1  ("Pavel Stehule" <pavel.stehule@hotmail.com>)
Responses Re: what can be wrong? backport plpgpsm to 8.1  ("Pavel Stehule" <pavel.stehule@hotmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Pavel Stehule" <pavel.stehule@hotmail.com> writes:
> I don't see any important difference, why 8.1. have to down.

I dunno, but gdb is doing you no favors with such a silly backtrace.
It sorta looks like you have some files built with -g and some without
... or perhaps you are trying to gdb the core file against the wrong
executable?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Race condition in pg_database_size()
Next
From: "Pavan Deolasee"
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug in VACUUM FULL ?