Re: Proposal: include PL/Proxy into core - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Proposal: include PL/Proxy into core
Date
Msg-id 21697.1175277016@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Proposal: include PL/Proxy into core  ("Marko Kreen" <markokr@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Proposal: include PL/Proxy into core  ("Marko Kreen" <markokr@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Marko Kreen" <markokr@gmail.com> writes:
> Now, why put it into core?

I don't think you have made a sufficient case for that.  I think it
should stay as an outside project for awhile and see what sort of
userbase it attracts.  If it becomes sufficiently popular I'd be
willing to consider adding it to core, but that remains to be seen.

We can barely keep up maintaining what's in core now --- we need to
be very strict about adding stuff that doesn't really have to be in
core, and this evidently doesn't, since you've got it working ...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout
Next
From: "Florian G. Pflug"
Date:
Subject: Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design