Re: RFC: changing autovacuum_naptime semantics - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Galy Lee
Subject Re: RFC: changing autovacuum_naptime semantics
Date
Msg-id 45F0AD78.9030501@oss.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: RFC: changing autovacuum_naptime semantics  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I don't have anything else as detailed as a "plan".  If you have
> suggestions, I'm all ears.
Cool, thanks for the update. :) We also have some new ideas on the
improvement of autovacuum now. I will raise it up later.

> Now regarding your restartable vacuum work.  
> Does this make sense?
I also have reached a similar conclusion now.  Thank you.

Regards
Galy


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Christian Bird"
Date:
Subject: who gets paid for this
Next
From: ITAGAKI Takahiro
Date:
Subject: Re: Log levels for checkpoint/bgwriter monitoring