Re: what can be wrong? backport plpgpsm to 8.1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: what can be wrong? backport plpgpsm to 8.1
Date
Msg-id BAY20-F1982E446AFFC2C1D19498BF97F0@phx.gbl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: what can be wrong? backport plpgpsm to 8.1  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
>
>Specifically I think you need to study this patch:
>http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2007-01/msg00370.php
>
>But isn't back-porting plpgpsm to old releases a waste of development
>and maintenance effort anyway?
>

I unlike it and last weak I play with it. But I don't expect so Debian and 
RH will be support 8.3 soon. And I would to help to expansion plpgpsm. When 
I comment FreeExecutorState, runtime works well (with some minor problems - 
domains). With 8.1 support I will have much bigger group of users, testers 
(I hope).

I have to study your patch.

Thank you
Pavel Stehule

_________________________________________________________________
Najdete si svou lasku a nove pratele na Match.com. http://www.msn.cz/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: what can be wrong? backport plpgpsm to 8.1
Next
From: "Simon Riggs"
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] scan_recycle_buffers