Nikolay Samokhvalov wrote:
> What about it? W/o this not large patch XML functionality in 8.3 will
> be weak...
> Will it be accepted?
>
>
In principle I am in favor of the patch.
Would it be better to use some more unlikely name for the dummy root
element used to process fragments than <x> ?
Perhaps even something in a special namespace?
cheers
andrew
