> Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org> writes:
> >> I'm confused. If this is exactly the same as EUC_JP, why do we need
> >> any new code at all?
>
> > I said *encoding schema" is same, not the contents (character set) is
> > same. In another word, characters included in EUC_JP are not same as
> > EUC_JIS_2004.
>
> I'm still confused. If the set of characters is different, then surely
> we need at least a different UTF8<->EUC_JIS_2004 conversion function?
Yes, exactly. I will come up with new conversions later.
> After that I will develop conversion part(it will take several days).
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
