Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant
Date
Msg-id 25465.1173148767@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> What happens if VACUUM comes across buffers that *are* already in the buffer
> cache. Does it throw those on the freelist too?

Not unless they have usage_count 0, in which case they'd be subject to
recycling by the next clock sweep anyway.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES]
Next
From: Gavin Sherry
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES]