Possible BUG in -head with stats - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Possible BUG in -head with stats
Date
Msg-id 45E6745C.9010005@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-hackers
Hello,

O.k. no one seemed interested in our 8.2 issues, so I thought i would
test on -head ;)

jd@scratch:/tmp/pg$ strace -c -p 3545
Process 3545 attached - interrupt to quit
Process 3545 detached
% time     seconds  usecs/call     calls    errors syscall
------ ----------- ----------- --------- --------- ----------------59.45    0.178412           3     70176     10128
poll22.68   0.068083           7     10294           rename12.05    0.036158           4     10294           open 2.98
 0.008929           1     10294           close 1.68    0.005051           0     60040           recvfrom 0.65
0.001954          0     10294           setitimer 0.46    0.001386           0     20588           write 0.03
0.000090          0     10294           mmap 0.02    0.000065           0     10294           munmap 0.00    0.000000
       0     10294           fstat 0.00    0.000000           0         1           brk 0.00    0.000000           0
10294     10128 rt_sigreturn 0.00    0.000000           0     10302           getppid
 
------ ----------- ----------- --------- --------- ----------------
100.00    0.300128                243459     20256 total


THe rename is being called 10294 times over 1 minute 56 seconds. This is
on the same machine and using the same test as mention here:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-02/msg01902.php

Joshua D. Drake
-- 
     === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997            http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Resumable vacuum proposal and design overview
Next
From: Zoltan Boszormenyi
Date:
Subject: Re: Is there a way to run heap_insert() AFTER ExecInsertIndexTuples() ?