David Fetter wrote:
> The first is in type_sanity, which basically doesn't understand that
> complex types now have array types associated with them and thinks
> they're orphan array types, so it's actually the test that's not
> right.
Hmm, I question the usefulness of automatically creating array types for
all relation types that are created -- the catalog bloat seems a bit too
much. An array of pg_autovacuum for example, does that make sense?
I'm not sure what was the reaction to having an "CREATE TYPE foo ARRAY
OF bar" command of some kind? I think this was discussed but not
explicitely rejected, or was it?
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
