Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> So, before an investment of any more time is made by either Abhijit or
> myself, I would like to get confirmation that a) there is broad
> agreement on the desirability of the feature
Yes, absolutely desirable.
> and b) that there is broad
> agreement on the general design (i.e. to use a circular buffer in shared
> memory, of configurable size, to hold the outstanding message queue).
Would it spill out to disk and expand (and shrink again) as required?
Loss of notifications should not occur imho.
Regards, Dave.
