Re: Patch license update to developer's FAQ - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Patch license update to developer's FAQ
Date
Msg-id 45E86D1C.2080107@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Patch license update to developer's FAQ  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Patch license update to developer's FAQ  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I have added to the developer's FAQ that we don't want
> non-BSD-compatible licensed patches:
> 
>     <li>PostgreSQL is licensed under a BSD license.  By posting a patch
>     to the public PostgreSQL mailling lists, you are giving the PostgreSQL
>     Global Development Group the non-revokable right to distribute your
>     patch under the BSD license.  If you use code that is available under
>     a BSD-compatible license (eg. public domain), please note that in your
>     email submission.  If the license is not BSD-compatible (e.g. GPL),
>     please do not post the patch.</li>

How about something simpler:

<li>PostgreSQL is licensed under a BSD license. Patches that are
submitted another a non-compatible license (such as the GPL) will be
ignored.</li>





-- 
     === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997            http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Simon Riggs"
Date:
Subject: Re: Updated propsoal for read-only queries on PITRslaves (SoC 2007)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: UPSERT