Re: Concurrent connections in psql - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Concurrent connections in psql
Date
Msg-id 1175030027.4386.226.camel@silverbirch.site
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Concurrent connections in psql  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: Concurrent connections in psql  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 17:11 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> >
> > I would love, love, love to be able to use this syntax within pg_dump as
> > well, so we can create multiple indexes in parallel at restore time.
> > Anyone fancy adding that as well? We should be able to speed up overall
> > index builds by x2 using concurrent builds.

> You will need to teach pg_restore any trick you use here - it doesn't 
> use psql.

The proposed change is to psql and making it work with pg_restore would
take a lot more thought, so probably not an 8.3 item. Should we make it
to neither because we can't make it to both?

--  Simon Riggs              EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Concurrent connections in psql
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Concurrent connections in psql