Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I have added to the developer's FAQ that we don't want
> > non-BSD-compatible licensed patches:
>
> How frequently is this actually a problem?
I don't think it is common. I didn't add that part, so if you also
think it is rare, I will remove that distinction. New text:
<li>PostgreSQL is licensed under a BSD license. By posting a patch to the public PostgreSQL mailling lists, you
aregiving the PostgreSQL Global Development Group the non-revokable right to distribute your patch under the BSD
license. If the patch is not BSD-licensed, it will be rejected.</li>
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
