Re: Patch license update to developer's FAQ - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Patch license update to developer's FAQ
Date
Msg-id 200703031612.l23GCoK25088@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Patch license update to developer's FAQ  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Patch license update to developer's FAQ  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Re: Patch license update to developer's FAQ  ("Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD" <ZeugswetterA@spardat.at>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I have added to the developer's FAQ that we don't want
> > non-BSD-compatible licensed patches:
> 
> How frequently is this actually a problem?

I don't think it is common.  I didn't add that part, so if you also
think it is rare, I will remove that distinction.  New text:
   <li>PostgreSQL is licensed under a BSD license.  By posting a patch   to the public PostgreSQL mailling lists, you
aregiving the PostgreSQL   Global Development Group the non-revokable right to distribute your   patch under the BSD
license. If the patch is not BSD-licensed, it   will be rejected.</li>
 

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>          http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://www.enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Shane Ambler
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL - 'SKYLINE OF' clause added!
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch license update to developer's FAQ