> I don't think it is common. I didn't add that part, so if
> you also think it is rare, I will remove that distinction. New text:
>
> <li>PostgreSQL is licensed under a BSD license. By posting a
patch
> to the public PostgreSQL mailling lists, you are giving the
PostgreSQL
> Global Development Group the non-revokable right to distribute
your
> patch under the BSD license. If the patch is not BSD-licensed, it
> will be rejected.</li>
I would remove the last sentence, since it puts the responsibility back
on the group (namely to actively reject).
Andreas
