Re: Patch license update to developer's FAQ - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Patch license update to developer's FAQ
Date
Msg-id 200703191653.l2JGr8o24842@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Patch license update to developer's FAQ  ("Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD" <ZeugswetterA@spardat.at>)
List pgsql-hackers
Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD wrote:
> 
> > I don't think it is common.  I didn't add that part, so if 
> > you also think it is rare, I will remove that distinction.  New text:
> > 
> >     <li>PostgreSQL is licensed under a BSD license.  By posting a
> patch
> >     to the public PostgreSQL mailling lists, you are giving the
> PostgreSQL
> >     Global Development Group the non-revokable right to distribute
> your
> >     patch under the BSD license.  If the patch is not BSD-licensed, it
> >     will be rejected.</li>
> 
> I would remove the last sentence, since it puts the responsibility back
> on the group (namely to actively reject).

Done.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>          http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://www.enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Grouped Index Tuples / Clustered Indexes
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures