If you read the autovacuum_naptime into an Interval object once, why can't
you just use timestamptz_pl_interval ? You won't be using the interval
input/output repeatedly surely.
Regards
Sailesh
--
Sailesh Krishnamurthy
Amalgamated Insight
[W] (650) 242-3503
[C] (650) 804-6585
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Alvaro Herrera
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 3:46 PM
To: Hackers
Subject: [HACKERS] how to add seconds to a TimestampTz
Is there a better way than going to time_t and back? I am currently
using this:
db->next_worker = time_t_to_timestamptz(timestamptz_to_time_t(current_time) + autovacuum_naptime);
(db->next_worker is a TimestampTz, as is current_time.
autovacuum_naptime is integer for a number of seconds)
but it doesn't seem clean, and the comments in the functions more or
less say that their use is discouraged.
I saw about doing it via the interval input/output but that's an awful
lot of work ...
Is this the first time this is going to be done in the backend?
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
