Re: Proposal: include PL/Proxy into core - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marko Kreen
Subject Re: Proposal: include PL/Proxy into core
Date
Msg-id e51f66da0703310119h36c5eaa0y70661ede01e9c361@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposal: include PL/Proxy into core  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 3/30/07, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> I, personally, think that it's worth talking about integrating these.
> However, the old versions were definitely NOT ready for integration, and the
> new versions went on the internet like a week ago.  Heck, I haven't even
> downloaded them yet.

Yeah, the old version was bit too complicated.  Thats why we
did a rewrite.  And it turned out nice and simple.

> Can we address these on the 8.4 timeline?  That will give the rest of us in
> the community time to download, try and debug the new SkyTools.  I know I'm
> planning on testing them and will know a lot more about your code/performance
> in a few months.  Is there a reason why getting PL/proxy into 8.3 is
> critical?

No hurry.  Just the timing was too good...

Also, if there are some design/API issues that may hinder
merging, we'd like to solve them immidiately.

-- 
marko


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Marko Kreen"
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: include PL/Proxy into core
Next
From: Russell Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Feature thought: idle in transaction timeout