Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
>> Allow the community to drive the inclusion by making it as easy as
>> possible to allow a proactive argument to take place by the people
>> actually using the product.
>
> This seems to be a rather poor decision making process: "Are the users
> happy with the new feature? If so, then apply the patch." It leads to
> unmanageable code.
Perhaps reading my message again is in order. I think it is pretty
obvious that the a user shouldn't determine if a patch should be applied.
My whole point was that if people are clamoring for the feature, it
could drive that feature to be more aggressively reviewed.
I can't even count how many times I see:
This seems like a corner case feature, I don't think we should add it.
So I am suggesting a way to insure that the feature is not considered
corner case. (if it is indeed not a corner case)
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
