Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Grzegorz Jaskiewicz
Subject Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes
Date
Msg-id 9435F455-7B24-40D6-B49C-23395D760051@pointblue.com.pl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
This is on dual ultra 2 sparc. with ultrawide 320 scsi drives. 512MB  
ram.
I had to drop size of DB, because the DB drive is 4GB (I do welecome  
bigger drives as donation, if someone asks - UWscsi 320).

here are my results. With only 4.2 patch (no maintain cluster order  
v5 patch). If the v5 patch was needed, please tell me - I am going  
rerun it with.

hope it is usefull.

Repeat 3 times to ensure repeatable results.
Timing is on.
select_with_normal_index
--------------------------                   100000
(1 row)

Time: 1727891.334 ms
select_with_normal_index
--------------------------                   100000
(1 row)

Time: 1325561.252 ms
select_with_normal_index
--------------------------                   100000
(1 row)

Time: 1348530.100 ms
Timing is off.
And now run the same tests with clustered index
Timing is on.
select_with_clustered_index
-----------------------------                      100000
(1 row)

Time: 870246.856 ms
select_with_clustered_index
-----------------------------                      100000
(1 row)

Time: 477089.456 ms
select_with_clustered_index
-----------------------------                      100000
(1 row)

Time: 381880.965 ms
Timing is off.





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Simon Riggs"
Date:
Subject: Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT (was Question:pg_classattributes and race conditions ?)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code?