Re: Auto creation of Partitions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jim C. Nasby
Subject Re: Auto creation of Partitions
Date
Msg-id 20070308184419.GU24979@nasby.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Auto creation of Partitions  (NikhilS <nikkhils@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Auto creation of Partitions
Re: Auto creation of Partitions
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 01:52:27PM +0530, NikhilS wrote:
> >I think it'd be great to make adding and removing partitions as
> >simple as ALTER TABLE. I don't think that DELETE should be the
> >mechanism to drop a partition, though. Again, DML statements
> >shouldn't be performing DDL.
> 
> 
> Since partition is inheritance-based, a simple DROP or  "NO INHERIT" will do
> the job to deal with the partition. Do we want to reinvent additional syntax
> when these are around and are documented?

Well, if the syntax for adding a new partition eventually ends up as
ALTER TABLE ADD PARTITION, then it would make more sense that you remove
a partition via ALTER TABLE DROP PARTITION.
-- 
Jim Nasby                                            jim@nasby.net
EnterpriseDB      http://enterprisedb.com      512.569.9461 (cell)


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: RFC: changing autovacuum_naptime semantics
Next
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: Auto creation of Partitions