Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout
Date
Msg-id 200704010036.01953.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Autovacuum vs statement_timeout  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jim@nasby.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> I seem to remember that we'd agreed that autovacuum should ignore any
> globally set statement_timeout, on the grounds that a poorly chosen
> setting could indefinitely prevent large tables from being vacuumed.

On a vaguely related matter, should programs such as pg_dump, vacuumdb, 
and reindexdb disable statement_timeout?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From:
Date:
Subject: Re: Last minute mini-proposal (I know, I know)forPQexecf()
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Macros for typtype (was Re: Arrays of Complex Types)